Teams

A.Mikula 40

2023 Cap Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 2.83 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-05-11vs C.WaltersLost 01
L#2 DoublesLaura Wingo / Mandy Steinhardt vs Caroline Walters / Mary Ellen Wetzler-Behar1-6, 1-6
2023-05-06vs K.Lamb40Won 20
W#1 SinglesMandy Steinhardt vs Marsha Seymour6-0, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRyland Herring / Aimee Mikula vs Jo Ann Novak / Jeannette Walker7-6, 0-6, 1-0
2023-05-02vs L.RedmondLost 02
L#1 DoublesLaura Wingo / Shannon Parham vs Ana Maria Allessi / Stephanie Lee4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesKatherine Baker-Neblett / Mandy Steinhardt vs Dora Reed / Laurie Compiano3-6, 1-6
2023-04-18Won 10
W#2 DoublesAimee Mikula / Mandy Steinhardt vs Sonya Rhiver / Janice Lewis6-2, 7-6
2023-03-30vs S.BreckenridgeLost 02
L#1 SinglesMandy Steinhardt vs Jennifer Anderson2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesLaura Wingo / Katherine Baker-Neblett vs Erin Hemminger / Kimberly Lamm1-6, 0-6
2023-03-21vs L.PanebiancoSplit 11
W#1 DoublesSuzy Kaelin / Ryland Herring vs Shannon Beach / Juli Johnson6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMandy Steinhardt / Laura Wingo vs Kate Rigsbee / Sheri Roberson2-6, 5-7
2023-03-14Won 10
W#1 DoublesStephanie Black / Ryland Herring vs Bernadette Hurley / Kelly Doggett6-4, 6-1
2023-03-09vs K.Gilreath 40+Lost 02
L#2 DoublesMandy Steinhardt / Laura Wingo vs Stacie White / Kristi Gilreath1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesShannon Parham / Ryland Herring vs Erin Wynia / Tina Goertz2-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.78 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.74
Kim Peters
published
3.03
Ryland Herring
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.80
Stephanie Black
published
2.67
Suzy Kaelin
published
2.59
Shannon Parham
published
2.55
Mandy Steinhardt
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.10
Laura Wingo
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mandy Steinhardt + Laura Wingo1633% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kim Peters
20W–20L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.74
3
Ryland Herring
80W–28L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%42%58%
3.03
Stephanie Black
5W–8L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%8%
2.80
Suzy Kaelin
3W–1L career · no lines in 2023
12%88%1%
2.67
Shannon Parham
2W–9L career · no lines in 2023
25%74%<1%
2.59
3
Mandy Steinhardt
52W–90L career · 7 lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
2.55
2.5
Laura Wingo
29W–57L career · 5 lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
2.10

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.