Teams

TN/Memphis/Cooper

2022 Adult 18 & Over Early Start League - Memphis · 4.0 Men

11 players · average NTRP 3.83 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-11-27vs TN/Memphis/HoehnLost 01
L#1 DoublesJohn Heard / Nick Gilder vs Robert Hoehn / Gary Clancy1-6, 6-7
2021-11-07vs TN/Memphis/HudsonLost 01
L#2 DoublesNick Gilder / Mark Cooper vs Keith Rice / Stephen Lewis5-7, 2-6
2021-11-04vs TN/Memphis/MobleyWon 10
W#2 DoublesRajesh Chandrasekaran / Nick Gilder vs Cory Heinkel / Donald Roshak6-2, 6-7, 1-0
2021-10-24vs TN/Memphis/MobleyWon 10
W#2 DoublesRajesh Chandrasekaran / Nick Gilder vs Cory Heinkel / Darshan Sampat7-6, 6-3
2021-10-17vs TN/Memphis/HoehnLost 01
L#1 SinglesNick Gilder vs Jon Nestler2-6, 0-6
2021-10-14Won 10
W#1 SinglesNick Gilder vs Samuel Stambaugh6-4, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.64 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
Tyler Darby
published
3.88
Nick Gilder
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.87
Daniel Murdoch
published 4
3.80
David Kam
published 4
3.77
Paul Woods
published
3.75
Bill Whitmire
published 4
3.39
John Heard
published
Chris Suhoza
published 3.5
3.21
Darrell Nephew
published 3.5
3.15
Rob Dannemiller
published
Thomas Fila
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Kam + John Heard123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tyler Darby
32W–10L career · no lines in 2022
<1%55%45%
3.98
4
Nick Gilder
111W–89L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%82%17%
3.88
4
Daniel Murdoch
41W–17L career · no lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
3.87
4
David Kam
32W–32L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.80
Paul Woods
21W–10L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Bill Whitmire
10W–10L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
John Heard
27W–21L career · no lines in 2022
<1%80%20%
3.39
3.5
Chris Suhoza
6W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Darrell Nephew
15W–34L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.21
Rob Dannemiller
16W–27L career · no lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.15
Thomas Fila
6W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.