Teams

LA - Double Aces

2023 USTA Adult 55 & Over – LA · LA - Women 7.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.25 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-07-30Won 10
W#2 DoublesGordana Raca / Maryann Brandon vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-07-29vs LA - Wise AcesLost 01
L#1 DoublesMaryann Brandon / Andrea Hutchman vs Nicole Martino / Kathleen Dohrmann0-6, 2-6
2023-07-15vs LA - Wise AcesLost 01
L#2 DoublesMaryann Brandon / Susan Downey vs Sonoma van Brunt / Adele Slaughter1-6, 0-6
2023-06-24vs LA - Team FEDALLost 01
L#1 DoublesMaryann Brandon / MARY WOODWARD vs Tamra Loeb / Nancy Bruyninx2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for LA - Women 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.88 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.53
Joni Martino
published
3.26
Gordana Raca
published
3.08
Theresa Sterling
published
3.03
Andrea Hutchman
published 3.5
2.95
Maryann Brandon
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.94
MARY WOODWARD
published
Diana Nyad
published 3
2.73
Stefanie Hall
published
2.62
Renee Mochkatel
published
2.60
Vanessa Nelson
published
2.54
Patricia Francisco
published
2.44
Andrea Crum
published 3
Michele Werdin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Vanessa Nelson + Patricia Francisco123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Joni Martino
9W–18L career · no lines in 2023
42%58%<1%
3.53
Gordana Raca
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
3%93%4%
3.26
Theresa Sterling
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
28%72%<1%
3.08
3.5
Andrea Hutchman
3W–14L career · no lines in 2023
41%59%<1%
3.03
3.5
Maryann Brandon
94W–139L career · type A · 4 lines in 2023
65%35%<1%
2.95
MARY WOODWARD
3W–9L career · no lines in 2023
66%34%<1%
2.94
3
Diana Nyad
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Stefanie Hall
5W–11L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
2.73
Renee Mochkatel
3W–4L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
2.62
Vanessa Nelson
7W–13L career · no lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
2.60
Patricia Francisco
8W–9L career · no lines in 2023
39%61%<1%
2.54
3
Andrea Crum
1W–5L career · type A · no lines in 2023
66%34%<1%
2.44
Michele Werdin
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.