Teams

LA - Ladybugs 3.0

2025 SoCal Doubles - LA · LA - Women 3.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.08 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-10-05vs LA - Fuzz OffWon 10
W#1 DoublesAmanda Phillips / Angelica Weaver vs Geraldine Farrell / Michelle Johnson6-2, 6-1
2025-10-04vs LA - WeHo Slicers 3.0Won 10
W#1 DoublesAngelica Weaver / Randi Robins vs Audra DeFranco / Doree Shafrir6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAngelica Weaver / Christine O'Neal vs Andrea Dunlop / Krista Li3-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for LA - Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.75 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.23
Angelica Weaver
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.99
Sally Ngo
published
2.94
Christine O'Neal
published 3
2.89
2.85
ARI KIM
published 3
2.79
Alyssa Binczyk
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.79
2.76
Randi Robins
published
2.73
Heidi Reed
published
2.59
Vy Bui
published
2.38
Luz Herrera
published
2.08
Melinda Martinez
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alyssa Binczyk + ARI KIM2445% gamesnot enough data
Aisha Conner-Gaten + Vy Bui314 matchesnot enough data
Luz Herrera + Christine O'Neal224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Angelica Weaver
29W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Sally Ngo
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%54%46%
2.99
3
Christine O'Neal
12W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
2.94
3
Aisha Conner-Gaten
10W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
2.89
3
ARI KIM
7W–8L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%14%
2.85
3
Alyssa Binczyk
25W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Alexandra Carrethers
1W–5L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.79
Randi Robins
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.76
Heidi Reed
9W–3L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
Vy Bui
14W–9L career · no lines in 2025
25%74%<1%
2.59
Luz Herrera
7W–14L career · no lines in 2025
81%19%<1%
2.38
Melinda Martinez
13W–18L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.08

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.