Teams

LTFCS RYALS

2023 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - SOCO · WOMEN 8.0 - 55 & OVER - SOCO

8 players · average NTRP 3.75 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-06-16vs CSRC MCPHERSONWon 10
W#3 DoublesDeborah Scruggs / Sara Michon vs Amy Laird / Lori McPherson6-2, 6-4
2023-06-09vs PBTC TUCKERLost 01
L#3 DoublesCarmen Ekblad / Deborah Scruggs vs Martina Lang / Christine Brown3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2023-06-02vs MEMPK GORTHYLost 02
L#1 DoublesSusan Moore / Terri Plummer vs Cheryl Gorthy / Jinna Ziegler1-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCarmen Ekblad / Nida Colao vs Kimberly Davis / Denise Nenoff2-6, 1-6
2023-05-26vs CSRC MCPHERSONSplit 11
W#2 DoublesTerri Plummer / Anne Ryals vs Amy Laird / Leanne Thompson2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLaura Kolivoski / Sara Michon vs Holly Strack / Susan Wilklow3-6, 4-6
2023-05-19vs PBTC TUCKERSplit 11
L#2 DoublesAnne Ryals / Sara Michon vs Paula Henson / Martina Lang4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesCarmen Ekblad / Henrietta Levis vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-05-12vs MEMPK GORTHYSplit 11
L#2 DoublesTerri Plummer / Deborah Scruggs vs Terry Beutelschies / Bonnie Iten3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesNida Colao / Carmen Ekblad vs Cheryl Gorthy / Denise Nenoff4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2023-05-05vs CSRC MCPHERSONSplit 11
L#2 DoublesCharlie Bishop / Terri Plummer vs Kady Hommel / Leanne Thompson4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSara Michon / Deborah Scruggs vs Lynn Mulder / Holly Strack1-6, 4-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 8.0 - 55 & OVER - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.36 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Charlie Bishop
published 4
3.58
Deborah Scruggs
published 4
3.45
Sara Michon
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.39
Carmen Ekblad
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.38
Terri Plummer
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.21
Anne Ryals
published 3.5
3.14
Henrietta Levis
published
Maura Houston
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Terri Plummer + Charlie Bishop3441% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Charlie Bishop
3W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Deborah Scruggs
6W–8L career · no lines in 2023
28%72%<1%
3.58
4
Sara Michon
74W–85L career · 4 lines in 2023
63%37%<1%
3.45
3.5
Carmen Ekblad
81W–72L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
3.39
3.5
Terri Plummer
57W–80L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
3.38
3.5
Anne Ryals
9W–10L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.21
Henrietta Levis
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
16%83%<1%
3.14
Maura Houston
37W–26L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.