Teams

Eagle Harbor - Strickland

2022 Duval Combo 18 & Over - Summer · Men 8.5

11 players · average NTRP 4.36 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-10-09vs Oakleaf/Eagle Landing - DunnWon 10
W#1 DoublesEthan Wichtendahl / Jose Feliciano vs Dustin DeAngelo / Tyler Dunn6-7, 6-4, 1-0
2022-09-24vs Williams Y - SaigWon 20
W#1 DoublesDavid Schilkofski / Dan Singleton vs Louis Saig / Matt Braun6-4, 7-6
W#2 DoublesEthan Wichtendahl / Jose Feliciano vs Robert Graham / Darren Odendaal6-2, 6-3
2022-09-21vs PeriasamyLost 01
L#1 DoublesDavid Schilkofski / Dan Singleton vs Govind Budda / Ravikiran Annareddy5-7, 4-6
2022-09-16vs PeriasamyWon 20
W#2 DoublesChristopher Lambert / Dan Singleton vs David Frakt / Jason Wilson5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJames Strickland / Jose Feliciano vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-08-27vs Oakleaf/Eagle Landing - DunnLost 01
L#2 DoublesDavid Schilkofski / Dan Singleton vs Clayton Tontarski / Norman Barelare6-2, 5-7, 0-1
2022-08-20vs FergusonWon 10
W#2 DoublesDavid Schilkofski / Dan Singleton vs Adam Rutstein / Eric Feibelman6-4, 6-4
2022-07-16vs FergusonLost 01
L#3 DoublesEthan Wichtendahl / Jose Feliciano vs Eric van Westering / Eric Feibelman2-6, 3-6
2022-07-09vs Williams Y - SaigWon 10
W#2 DoublesDavid Schilkofski / Dan Singleton vs Louis Saig / Michael Halusek6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 8.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.88 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.32
David Schilkofski
published 4.5
Bill Chapman
published 4.5
4.23
Ethan Wichtendahl
published 4.5
4.11
Christopher Lambert
published 4.5
3.97
James Strickland
published 4.5
3.85
Thomas Keller
published
3.69
Dan Singleton
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.62
Gregory Sapp
published 4
3.59
Jose Feliciano
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.57
Walter Rios
published
Jason Young
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dan Singleton + Jose Feliciano10653% games+3.0% vs expected
Dan Singleton + James Strickland123 matchesnot enough data
Dan Singleton + Thomas Keller123 matchesnot enough data
James Strickland + Christopher Lambert123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
David Schilkofski
8W–6L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
4.32
4.5
Bill Chapman
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4.5
Ethan Wichtendahl
3W–3L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
4.23
4.5
Christopher Lambert
4W–5L career · no lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
4.11
4.5
James Strickland
4W–8L career · no lines in 2022
59%41%<1%
3.97
Thomas Keller
7W–10L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.85
4
Dan Singleton
136W–103L career · 6 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Gregory Sapp
3W–5L career · no lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
3.62
Jose Feliciano
82W–63L career · 4 lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
3.59
Walter Rios
1W–9L career · no lines in 2022
29%71%<1%
3.57
Jason Young
7W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.