Teams

Yadkin/Varsik/3.5 40+

2025 Yadkin Valley Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Women Monday (night)

16 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-05-05vs Yadkin/Hollan/OT/40+3.5Won 10
W#4 DoublesElaine Fox / Laura Varsik vs Nikki Francis / Kristen Mason6-2, 6-1
2025-04-28vs Yadkin/Cartrette/40+3.5Won 10
W#4 DoublesElaine Fox / Cristina Fernandes vs Emily Spillman / Emily Shute7-5, 7-5
2025-04-21vs Yadkin/White/40+ 3.5Won 10
W#3 DoublesElaine Fox / Cristina Fernandes vs Donna Johnson / Felice Manget Harvey6-1, 6-3
2025-04-14vs Yadkin/Hollan/OT/40+3.5Won 10
W#4 DoublesMarla Damas / Elaine Fox vs Brandi Jacques / Betsy Harris4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-04-08vs Yadkin/White/40+ 3.5Won 31
W#1 DoublesClarissa Tatum / Kristi Nicholson vs Nancy Hart / Lucie Temple6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKatelyn Chapman / Mildred Schultz vs Donna Johnson / Dudley Commander Burkhalter6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesLaura Gregory / Cristina Fernandes vs Sarah Osadnick / Nora Ferrell7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#4 DoublesLaura Varsik / Marla Damas vs Amy Braden / Felice Manget Harvey6-1, 6-2
2025-03-10vs Yadkin/White/40+ 3.5Won 10
W#2 DoublesElaine Fox / Dawn Frank vs Donna Johnson / Dudley Commander Burkhalter6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women Monday (night) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.53
Mildred Schultz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.53
Laura Varsik
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
3.52
Clarissa Tatum
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.47
Meghan de Young
published
3.47
Danielle Wright
published 3.5
3.45
Katelyn Chapman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.36
Kristi Nicholson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.29
Kim Haynes
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.27
Cristina Fernandes
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Amber Koll
published 3.5
3.24
Laura Gregory
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.24
Marla Damas
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
3.21
Elaine Fox
usually #4 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.21
Linda Lowman
published
3.09
Dawn Frank
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.08
Paige Reilly
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cristina Fernandes + Laura Gregory1442% games−14.2% vs expected
Meghan de Young + Clarissa Tatum314 matchesnot enough data
Dawn Frank + Cristina Fernandes123 matchesnot enough data
Kristi Nicholson + Paige Reilly303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mildred Schultz
16W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%42%58%
3.53
Laura Varsik
56W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%42%58%
3.53
3.5
Clarissa Tatum
59W–24L career · type A · 1 line in 2025
<1%44%56%
3.52
Meghan de Young
43W–18L career · no lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
3.47
3.5
Danielle Wright
3W–0L career · no lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
3.47
Katelyn Chapman
53W–25L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.45
Kristi Nicholson
72W–61L career · 1 line in 2025
1%84%16%
3.36
Kim Haynes
21W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Cristina Fernandes
7W–33L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Amber Koll
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Laura Gregory
22W–26L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
Marla Damas
3W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
4%92%3%
3.24
Elaine Fox
113W–96L career · 5 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.21
Linda Lowman
43W–44L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
3.5
Dawn Frank
12W–32L career · 1 line in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.09
Paige Reilly
15W–7L career · no lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.08

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.