Teams

Willow Oaks Wilder

2022 Richmond Adult 40 & Over Weekday · Richmond Adult 40 & Over 4.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-07-22vs Burkwood MatthewsLost 01
L#1 DoublesJohanna Farrell / Sharon Fuller vs Julie Hawthorne / Donna Smith2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-07-19vs Burkwood PoehlerWon 10
W#2 DoublesKelly Barbour / Anne Elles vs Holly Miles / Theresa Hughes4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2022-07-15vs TDC WymanLost 01
L#2 DoublesHeather Garnett / Anne Elles vs Nicole Wyman / Michele Smith6-3, 6-7, 0-1
2022-07-12vs Westwood HauseSplit 11
L#1 DoublesNiki Smith / Johanna Farrell vs Ellie StJohn / Alison Wayland5-7, 6-0, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLaurie Schaaf / Maya Wilder vs Liza Hause / Barbara Hassett6-3, 6-4
2022-07-08vs CCV LovingWon 20
W#1 DoublesJohanna Farrell / Maya Wilder vs Betsy Richardson / Suzanne Brown6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesPage Kral / Heather Garnett vs Kristin Mullins / Laura West Hatcher6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2022-07-05vs RCC SamuelsWon 20
W#1 DoublesMaya Wilder / Anne Elles vs Jane Taft / Debra Carter6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKelly Barbour / Heather Garnett vs Heather Barefoot / Sherri Phillips3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2022-07-01vs ACAC Carman Wise AcesWon 10
W#1 DoublesNiki Smith / Maya Wilder vs Kelly Naughton / Liesl Delisio6-2, 6-2
2022-06-28vs Woodlake FranceSplit 11
L#1 DoublesNiki Smith / Johanna Farrell vs Greet France / Tina Tomlinson3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKelly Barbour / Anne Elles vs Christine Lemons / Kimberly Ritter6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 40 & Over 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.69 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
Jessica Morton
published
3.85
Anne Elles
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.79
Johanna Farrell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.73
Sharon Fuller
published
3.69
Heather Garnett
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.65
Maya Wilder
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.63
Niki Smith
published
3.48
Julia Calamita
published
3.44
Laurie Schaaf
published
Sharan Wilder
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maya Wilder + Anne Elles5157% gamesnot enough data
Heather Garnett + Julia Calamita123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jessica Morton
8W–1L career · no lines in 2022
<1%55%45%
3.98
4
Anne Elles
147W–130L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
3.85
4
Johanna Farrell
95W–131L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%93%5%
3.79
Sharon Fuller
9W–6L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Heather Garnett
50W–63L career · 3 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
Maya Wilder
64W–40L career · 4 lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.65
Niki Smith
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
15%84%<1%
3.63
Julia Calamita
1W–6L career · no lines in 2022
58%42%<1%
3.48
Laurie Schaaf
0W–5L career · no lines in 2022
69%31%<1%
3.44
Sharan Wilder
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.