Teams

Hot Lobsters

2023 Washington D.C. Singles · Washington D.C. Singles 3.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.30 / WASHINGTON D.C.

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-09-10vs Set2WinLost 02
L#1 SinglesLorena Alfaro vs Macon Field0-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesTara Rethore vs Tracy Phillips1-6, 2-6
2023-08-26vs Set2WinSplit 11
W#1 SinglesCatherine McQueen vs Tracy Phillips7-6, 2-2
L#2 SinglesLorena Alfaro vs Nicole Ifill0-6, 3-6
2023-08-19vs Single LadiesLost 02
L#2 SinglesAnne Elliot vs Anjali Garg2-6, 5-7
L#3 SinglesTara Rethore vs Jacinda Johnson2-6, 5-5
2023-08-13vs Single LadiesSplit 11
W#2 SinglesAnne Elliot vs Andaiye Hamilton6-4, 4-3
L#3 SinglesLorena Alfaro vs Jacinda Johnson1-6, 6-2, 0-1
2023-08-12vs Backhanded ComplimentsSplit 11
L#1 SinglesCatherine McQueen vs Vera Ryss2-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesIndre Conners vs Kristin Hume6-1, 3-3
2023-07-29vs Single LadiesSplit 11
W#1 SinglesCatherine McQueen vs Anjali Garg6-4, 6-3
L#2 SinglesSusan Hamrock vs Claris Brock2-6, 1-6
2023-07-22vs Backhanded ComplimentsWon 21
W#1 SinglesSusan Hamrock vs Rachael Smith6-3, 5-5
W#2 SinglesIndre Conners vs Angela Garcia6-1, 5-2
L#3 SinglesTara Rethore vs Deborah Rosenblum1-6, 1-6
2023-07-15vs Set2WinLost 12
L#1 SinglesIndre Conners vs Heidi Goulding3-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesAnne Elliot vs Meg Tronquet1-6, 5-5
W#3 SinglesSarah Yeiser vs Gay Trinkner6-3, 0-3
2023-07-08vs Backhanded ComplimentsLost 01
L#1 SinglesLorena Alfaro vs Katherine Koleski5-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Washington D.C. Singles 3.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Single Ladies54131427219
2Hot Lobsters2781937262

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.04 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Anne Elliot
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
Catherine McQueen
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
Grace Kim
published 3.5
3.16
Sarah Yeiser
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
2.83
Indre Conners
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.83
Lorena Alfaro
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 25% · published 3
Susan Hamrock
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Susan Wade
published
Tara Rethore
usually #3 Singles 57%, also #1 Singles 29% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Anne Elliot
10W–15L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
Catherine McQueen
4W–5L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Grace Kim
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sarah Yeiser
4W–8L career · 1 line in 2023
11%89%<1%
3.16
3
Indre Conners
3W–7L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%90%9%
2.83
3
Lorena Alfaro
134W–151L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%90%9%
2.83
Susan Hamrock
10W–17L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Susan Wade
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Tara Rethore
8W–14L career · 7 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.