Teams

CTL18/Fuerst/WWD

Combo 18 & Over · 18 & Over Combo Women - 2.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.31 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 18 & Over Combo Women - 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.72 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Carol Fuerst
published 4.5
3.73
Haleigh Boynton
published 4
3.27
Amy Rollins
published 3.5
Gaby Quarles
published 3
2.73
Suneeta Kamana
published
2.63
2.29
Cinda Wathen
published 3
2.26
MacRina Easley
published
2.13
Beth Amodio
published 2.5
Angela Nash
published
Linda Woodard
published
Martha Conroy
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

MacRina Easley + Beth Amodio6553% games+0.6% vs expected
Gaby Quarles + Suneeta Kamana4347% games−8.4% vs expected
Suneeta Kamana + Beth Amodio91146% games−8.6% vs expected
Suneeta Kamana + Haleigh Boynton4163% gamesnot enough data
MacRina Easley + Suneeta Kamana213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Carol Fuerst
39W–16L career · type A · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Haleigh Boynton
103W–47L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
3.5
Amy Rollins
120W–105L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3
Charlotte Lindsey
8W–30L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Gaby Quarles
44W–29L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Suneeta Kamana
54W–68L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Abigail Duckworth
6W–5L career · no lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
2.63
3
Cinda Wathen
7W–14L career · no lines in 2022
94%6%<1%
2.29
MacRina Easley
22W–35L career · no lines in 2022
0%97%3%
2.26
2.5
Beth Amodio
31W–41L career · no lines in 2022
0%>99%<1%
2.13
Angela Nash
0W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Linda Woodard
11W–24L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Martha Conroy
9W–18L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.