Teams

CV-Sun City Shadow Hills/B Terhar

2025 USTA Adult 55 & Over - CV · CV Men 7.0

8 players · average NTRP 3.38 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-03-17vs CV-Mission Hills/Dan KarnowskyLost 01
L#1 DoublesPaul Cain / Roger Davis vs Luke Breton / Lewis Tanenbaum7-6, 5-7, 1-0
2025-02-10vs CV-Rancho La Quinta/GirlingLost 01
L#1 DoublesPaul Cain / Roger Davis vs Jerry Kurtzweil / John Thekkethala2-6, 1-6
2025-02-03vs CV-Rancho La Quinta/A WebbLost 01
L#1 DoublesRoger Davis / Paul Cain vs Andrew Fimiano / David Grigg7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2025-01-27vs CV-Mission Hills/Dan KarnowskyWon 21
L#1 DoublesBob Lipnosky / BILL TERHAR vs Ed Sweep / Donald Miller2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesScott Brown / Paul Groth vs John MacDonald / Ken Weller6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesRoger Davis / Glen Stock vs Daniel Karnowsky / Andrew Pollin6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2025-01-20vs CV-Palm Desert TC/S SkorupaWon 10
W#3 DoublesPaul Cain / Roger Davis vs Scott Skorupa / RICHARD NELSON6-4, 6-2
2025-01-13vs CV-Toscana CC/IckeLost 01
L#1 DoublesPaul Cain / Roger Davis vs Thomas Carlson / Garrett Mullen5-7, 0-6
2025-01-06vs CV-LLW-Indian Wells TG/SloanLost 01
L#1 DoublesPaul Cain / Roger Davis vs Kyle Ferguson / William Carrick4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for CV Men 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.99 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Bob Lipnosky
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Barry Cooper
published 3.5
3.05
Cesar Vallejo
published 3.5
2.75
BILL TERHAR
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Glen Stock
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Paul Cain
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
Paul Groth
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Roger Davis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Paul Cain + Roger Davis123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Bob Lipnosky
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Barry Cooper
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Cesar Vallejo
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.05
3
BILL TERHAR
3W–8L career · type A · 1 line in 2025
4%93%4%
2.75
Glen Stock
1W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Paul Cain
20W–25L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Paul Groth
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Roger Davis
3W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.