Teams

KDeHaven

2022 Cap Mixed 65 & over · 8.0 Mixed

6 players · average NTRP 3.62 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-08-05vs beckyprocter65Won 20
W#1 DoublesMichell Wilson / Steven Wilson vs Rebecca Procter / Michael Rhaney6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMindy Dehaven / Ken Dehaven vs Donna Allen / Steve Greer5-7, 7-6, 1-0
2022-07-28vs beckyprocter65Lost 03
L#1 DoublesSteven Wilson / Michell Wilson vs Rebecca Procter / Kenneth Gillespie4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCharles Venners / Fran Ange vs Donna Allen / Michael Rhaney2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesKen Dehaven / Mindy Dehaven vs Linda Winn / John Winn5-7, 6-7
2022-07-07vs beckyprocter65Won 10
W#1 DoublesFran Ange / Charles Venners vs Susan Doninger Greer / Steve Greer6-1, 7-5
2022-06-30vs beckyprocter65Split 11
L#1 DoublesSteven Anderson / Fran Ange vs Michael Rhaney / Sharon Foster5-7, 5-7
W#2 DoublesSteven Wilson / Michell Wilson vs Mark Stephenson / Susan Doninger Greer6-3, 6-2
2022-06-29vs beckyprocter65Split 11
L#1 DoublesMindy Dehaven / Ken Dehaven vs Rebecca Procter / Michael Rhaney5-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesFran Ange / Charles Venners vs Elizabeth Samuels / Mark Stephenson6-2, 6-2
2022-06-23vs beckyprocter65Won 30
W#1 DoublesFran Ange / Charles Venners vs Linda Winn / John Winn6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMichell Wilson / Steven Wilson vs Susan Doninger Greer / Steve Greer6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMindy Dehaven / Ken Dehaven vs Sharon Foster / Kenneth Gillespie6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2022-06-09vs beckyprocter65Split 11
W#1 DoublesCharles Venners / Fran Ange vs John Winn / Linda Winn6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesSteven Wilson / Michell Wilson vs Michael Rhaney / Rosa Morrow4-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.41 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.74
Mindy Dehaven
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.49
Ken Dehaven
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.45
Michell Wilson
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.29
Fran Ange
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.24
Linda Carroll
published
3.23
Steven Wilson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mindy Dehaven + Ken Dehaven131647% gamesnot enough data
Steven Wilson + Michell Wilson224 matchesnot enough data
Michell Wilson + Ken Dehaven314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Mindy Dehaven
23W–41L career · type S · 4 lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.74
3.5
Ken Dehaven
94W–89L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%53%47%
3.49
3.5
Michell Wilson
52W–53L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%64%36%
3.45
3.5
Fran Ange
74W–101L career · 6 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.29
Linda Carroll
3W–0L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.24
Steven Wilson
4W–3L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.