Teams

Angelia & Jeremy

2021 Mixed 18 & Over · 6.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ALASKA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-02-26vs EmilyLost 03
L#1 DoublesEd Ulman / Cindy Hemry vs Nathan Thomas / Allison Burand2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJeremy Conkling / Jane McKinney vs Mark Fisk / Emily Elison1-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesPAUL RISSE / Angelina Salvato vs Neil Kaiser / Rena Yancha3-6, 1-6
2021-02-19vs Beluga BallersLost 03
L#1 DoublesJeremy Conkling / Angelina Salvato vs Donna Newman / Patrick Rumley1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJane McKinney / Ed Ulman vs Penny Rohacek / George Newman0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesRichard Clendaniel / Barbara Jacobs vs Eric Coulter / Leilah Hemmen5-7, 3-6
2021-02-05vs ChristieLost 03
L#1 DoublesJeremy Conkling / Cindy Hemry vs Christie Wyzykowski / Douglas Bliss1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesAngelina Salvato / PAUL RISSE vs Tom Wolforth / Susan Brunner4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesNANCY DARIGO / Richard Clendaniel vs Cynthia Henie / Douglas Henie3-6, 2-6
2021-01-29vs EmilyLost 03
L#1 DoublesAngelina Salvato / PAUL RISSE vs Nathan Thomas / Kayleigh Bottini1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCindy Hemry / Ed Ulman vs Allison Burand / Mark Fisk0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesBarbara Jacobs / Richard Clendaniel vs Emily Elison / Neil Kaiser4-6, 2-6
2021-01-22vs Beluga BallersLost 03
L#1 DoublesJeremy Conkling / Angelina Salvato vs Donna Newman / George Newman2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRichard Clendaniel / Cindy Hemry vs Penny Rohacek / Patrick Rumley2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesEd Ulman / Barbara Jacobs vs Jennifer Duclos / Jack DuClos1-6, 2-6
2021-01-15vs ChristieLost 03
L#1 DoublesAngelina Salvato / PAUL RISSE vs Douglas Henie / Cynthia Henie5-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesEd Ulman / Jane McKinney vs Tom Wolforth / Susan Brunner3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesRichard Clendaniel / NANCY DARIGO vs Christie Wyzykowski / Douglas Bliss3-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.86 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Jeremy Conkling
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.27
Angelina Salvato
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
Barbara Jacobs
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.73
Richard Clendaniel
usually #3 Doubles 78%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published 3
2.47
PAUL RISSE
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.33
Ed Ulman
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 2.5
Cindy Hemry
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Jane McKinney
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
NANCY DARIGO
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeremy Conkling + Angelina Salvato1734% games−7.0% vs expected
Barbara Jacobs + Richard Clendaniel2346% gamesnot enough data
Barbara Jacobs + PAUL RISSE134 matchesnot enough data
PAUL RISSE + Angelina Salvato044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Jeremy Conkling
55W–26L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%49%51%
3.50
3.5
Angelina Salvato
19W–22L career · type S · 6 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.27
3
Barbara Jacobs
21W–47L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
3
Richard Clendaniel
61W–93L career · type S · 9 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
2.73
2.5
PAUL RISSE
46W–64L career · 9 lines in 2021
0%59%41%
2.47
2.5
Ed Ulman
17W–52L career · type M · 5 lines in 2021
0%90%10%
2.33
Cindy Hemry
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Jane McKinney
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
NANCY DARIGO
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.