Teams

OK/Tipton-Freeman/65&over8.0W

2023 OKCAdult 65 & Over League · 8.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.88 / OKLAHOMA

View scouting list →
Flight standings1 teams · 8.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1OK/Tipton-Freeman/65&over8.0W000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Maria Rocha
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.68
Susie Hurst
published
3.55
Carolyn Clark
published 3.5
3.52
Camille LaGrossa
published 4
3.49
Annette Woodall
published 4
3.33
Linda Bahan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.26
Carey Freeman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.21
Renee Pascale
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.16
Jan Tipton
published
Kathleen Ruyle
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carey Freeman + Jan Tipton2357% games+19.7% vs expected
Linda Bahan + Renee Pascale10164% games+15.6% vs expected
Renee Pascale + Carolyn Clark8071% games+8.4% vs expected
Linda Bahan + Kathleen Ruyle6354% games−1.7% vs expected
Annette Woodall + Susie Hurst211555% games−2.1% vs expected
Annette Woodall + Carey Freeman2448% games−7.2% vs expected
Renee Pascale + Jan Tipton1439% gamesnot enough data
Jan Tipton + Maria Rocha3255% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Maria Rocha
64W–37L career · 2 lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.77
Susie Hurst
38W–27L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.68
3.5
Carolyn Clark
24W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%37%63%
3.55
4
Camille LaGrossa
7W–9L career · no lines in 2023
43%56%<1%
3.52
4
Annette Woodall
48W–35L career · no lines in 2023
53%47%<1%
3.49
Linda Bahan
121W–80L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%1%99%
3.33
4
Carey Freeman
66W–61L career · 3 lines in 2023
95%5%<1%
3.26
Renee Pascale
130W–62L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%7%93%
3.21
Jan Tipton
53W–58L career · no lines in 2023
<1%13%87%
3.16
Kathleen Ruyle
13W–10L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.