Teams

Team Sloane

2025 Hampton Roads Adult 40 & Over · Hampton Roads Adult 40 & Over 4.5 Men

11 players · average NTRP 4.25 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-07-07vs Bautista - Deez NetzLost 01
L#1 DoublesMichael Tenn / Matthew Mazzoni vs Michael Stoney / Jonathan Santos4-6, 3-6
2025-06-30vs Bautista - Deez NetzLost 01
L#1 DoublesHank Brooks / Michael Tenn vs John Chandler / Rainfredo Bautista3-6, 3-6
2025-06-09vs Bautista - Deez NetzLost 04
L#1 DoublesHank Brooks / Ken Soliday vs William Hall / Cleophas D'Auvergne2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesDanilo Angeles vs William Graham6-7, 6-7
L#2 DoublesDavid Slack / Michael Tenn vs Ramel Bautista / Michael Stoney0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDavid Sloane / Giovanni Donatelli vs Rainfredo Bautista / David Flage2-6, 2-6
2025-06-02vs Bautista - Deez NetzLost 04
L#1 DoublesBrandon Beavers / Giovanni Donatelli vs John Chandler / Cleophas D'Auvergne4-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesMiki Mizuki vs David Flage1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesRodney Malone / David Sloane vs Ramel Bautista / Rainfredo Bautista5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMatthew Mazzoni / Cheng Tung vs William Hall / Michael Stoney4-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Hampton Roads Adult 40 & Over 4.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.87 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.16
Brandon Beavers
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.79
Matthew Mazzoni
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Danilo Angeles
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
David Sloane
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.65
Cheng Tung
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Giovanni Donatelli
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Hank Brooks
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Ken Soliday
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Michael Tenn
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Miki Mizuki
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Rodney Malone
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Brandon Beavers
2W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
13%86%1%
4.16
Matthew Mazzoni
5W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
93%7%<1%
3.79
4
Danilo Angeles
5W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
4
David Sloane
0W–2L career · type A · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Cheng Tung
4W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
99%1%<1%
3.65
Giovanni Donatelli
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Hank Brooks
1W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Ken Soliday
0W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Michael Tenn
0W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Miki Mizuki
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Rodney Malone
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.