Teams

MG-Stapper

2023 Spring USTA 55 & Over Day League-Montgomery · 4.0 Women Day

12 players · average NTRP 3.90 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 4.0 Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Erin Bullington
published
3.65
Barbi Gelabert
published 4
3.58
Carol Stapper
published 4
3.54
Ann Osten
published 4
3.53
Ethel Holladay
published
3.48
Leah Leal
published
3.47
Susan Veres
published
3.40
Debbie Daniel
published 4
3.39
Lisa Eley
published
3.28
Nora Cammack
published
Cindy Yarbrough
published 3.5
3.17
Kimberly Mathews
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Eley + Susan Veres033 matchesnot enough data
Susan Veres + Ethel Holladay123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Erin Bullington
5W–7L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.81
4
Barbi Gelabert
7W–14L career · no lines in 2023
14%86%1%
3.65
4
Carol Stapper
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
27%73%<1%
3.58
4
Ann Osten
4W–11L career · no lines in 2023
39%61%<1%
3.54
Ethel Holladay
11W–8L career · no lines in 2023
42%58%<1%
3.53
Leah Leal
11W–17L career · no lines in 2023
57%43%<1%
3.48
Susan Veres
2W–8L career · no lines in 2023
58%42%<1%
3.47
4
Debbie Daniel
2W–6L career · no lines in 2023
77%23%<1%
3.40
Lisa Eley
0W–7L career · no lines in 2023
78%22%<1%
3.39
Nora Cammack
0W–6L career · no lines in 2023
94%6%<1%
3.28
3.5
Cindy Yarbrough
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kimberly Mathews
4W–4L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%1%
3.17

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.