Teams

2 Avalon Pearsall/Voeks

2025 Richmond Adult 40 & Over Weekday Women · Richmond Adult 40 & Over Weekday 4.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-07-17vs 10 CCV DeLaceyLost 02
L#2 DoublesMeghan Pearsall / Toni O'Reilly vs Ashley Millen / Elizabeth Moore3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKaren Devalk / Haidee Cline vs Mary Bartzen / Kirsti Goodwin6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2025-07-15vs 3 Westwood HauseWon 10
W#1 SinglesHaidee Cline vs Jordan Harper6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2025-07-10vs 1 RCC SamuelsLost 02
L#1 DoublesMichele Smith / Toni O'Reilly vs Geri Samuels / Nicole Wyman6-2, 6-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesHaidee Cline / Dede Davis vs Christy Holt / Debra Carter6-7, 1-6
2025-07-08vs 11 MTC TurnerLost 02
L#1 DoublesMichele Smith / Toni O'Reilly vs Karen Budlong / Laurie Miller4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesDeirdre Vaughan vs Pamela Stidham3-6, 0-4
2025-07-01vs 8 TDC - DukeSplit 11
L#1 SinglesDeirdre Vaughan vs Katherine Lawrence1-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesBeth Jones / Toni O'Reilly vs Rhonda Underwood / Erica Bragg6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2025-06-27vs 13 ACAC DelisioLost 01
L#2 DoublesLisa Voeks / Deirdre Vaughan vs Sonya Carman / Heather Colberg1-6, 4-6
2025-06-26vs 6 Herm Bauer-LinesWon 20
W#1 SinglesHaidee Cline vs Kimberly Ross6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKaren Devalk / Toni O'Reilly vs Mary Williams / Sherri Phillips1-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-06-24vs 4 Woodlake - Glen/FathWon 10
W#2 DoublesHaidee Cline / Lisa Voeks vs Karen Brady / Jennifer Thaxton6-7, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 40 & Over Weekday 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.53
Suzanne Mathias
published
3.46
Jeannette Reiter
published
3.43
Karen Devalk
published
3.41
Haidee Cline
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.41
Dede Davis
published 3.5
3.39
Caroline Ogilvie
published 3.5
3.37
Meghan Pearsall
published
3.32
Toni O'Reilly
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.27
Deirdre Vaughan
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 3.5
3.24
Teresa Lancaster
published
Lisa Voeks
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Suzanne Mathias
0W–9L career · no lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
3.53
Jeannette Reiter
1W–8L career · no lines in 2025
60%40%<1%
3.46
Karen Devalk
3W–6L career · no lines in 2025
69%31%<1%
3.43
Haidee Cline
91W–91L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.41
3.5
Dede Davis
7W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%74%25%
3.41
3.5
Caroline Ogilvie
101W–84L career · no lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.39
Meghan Pearsall
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
82%18%<1%
3.37
Toni O'Reilly
61W–67L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Deirdre Vaughan
162W–177L career · 7 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Teresa Lancaster
7W–23L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
Lisa Voeks
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.