Teams

Harrell - MTC

2025 Shenandoah Adult 18 & Over Weekday Women · Shenandoah Adult 18 & Over Weekday 3.5 Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.42 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-06-03vs Place - Sweet ShotsLost 01
L#1 DoublesSheila Harrell / Daphne Himelfarb vs Elizabeth Pyszka / Josephine Hughes7-5, 2-6, 0-1
2025-05-27vs Furgal- Spring CrushWon 10
W#1 DoublesSheila Harrell / Cleo Gewirz vs Devika Eddula / Mindi Moshides6-1, 6-3
2025-05-15vs Providakes - Get A GripLost 01
L#1 DoublesSheila Harrell / Cleo Gewirz vs Janet Thede / Wendy Rose3-6, 2-6
2025-04-29vs Rathbone- Fired UpWon 10
W#2 DoublesSheila Harrell / Cleo Gewirz vs Theresa Manion / Stephanie Kennedy6-4, 6-1
2025-04-22vs Place - Sweet ShotsWon 10
W#1 DoublesSheila Harrell / Cleo Gewirz vs Michelle Grande / Rochelle Balough6-4, 6-0
2025-04-15vs Yarmosh - Tough LoveWon 10
W#2 DoublesSheila Harrell / Maria Costea vs Katherine Deming / Peggah Wilson6-2, 6-2
2025-04-08vs Tennis Babes 3.5- PongsugreeWon 10
W#2 DoublesSheila Harrell / France Bognon vs Taylor Marr / Hannah Auyang6-3, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Shenandoah Adult 18 & Over Weekday 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
Sheila Harrell
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.28
Cleo Gewirz
published 3.5
Emily Hannum
published 3.5
3.24
Daphne Himelfarb
published 3.5
3.24
Maureen St Germain
published
3.19
Tamara Clarke
published
3.16
Elizabeth Billings
published 3.5
3.15
Jane Covington
published
3.12
Maria Costea
published
3.05
Paula Dowdy
published
2.92
Kristina Wilder
published
2.86
Ashley Whitner
published 3
Liza Eldredge
published
Selina McPherson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maureen St Germain + Tamara Clarke2550% games+9.7% vs expected
Cleo Gewirz + Sheila Harrell213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Sheila Harrell
132W–87L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
3.43
3.5
Cleo Gewirz
5W–2L career · no lines in 2025
1%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Emily Hannum
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Daphne Himelfarb
5W–3L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%2%
3.24
Maureen St Germain
6W–8L career · no lines in 2025
3%94%2%
3.24
Tamara Clarke
57W–80L career · no lines in 2025
8%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Elizabeth Billings
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
12%88%<1%
3.16
Jane Covington
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%<1%
3.15
Maria Costea
2W–10L career · no lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.12
Paula Dowdy
0W–5L career · no lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.05
Kristina Wilder
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
2.92
3
Ashley Whitner
9W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%86%14%
2.86
Liza Eldredge
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sandra Bravo-Greenberg
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Selina McPherson
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.