Teams

Suntree - Ford

2025 Brevard Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Adult 40 & Over - Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-03-03vs EFSC - TaylorWon 10
W#1 DoublesSharon Ford / Sacha Armstrong vs Lisa Shaffer / Susan Wilkes7-6, 6-2
2025-02-24vs Kiwi - SalvatoreWon 10
W#1 DoublesMandy Smith / Sacha Armstrong vs Elise Johnson / Julianne Moore7-6, 6-0
2025-02-17vs Fee - LuerLost 01
L#1 DoublesSacha Armstrong / Sharon Ford vs Nichol Fraser / Laura Rouveyrol3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2025-02-10vs Brevard/Aboud/40&Over3.0WLost 02
L#1 DoublesSacha Armstrong / Angelia Layun vs Megan Holthaus / Diana Hayslip6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSharon Ford / Mandy Smith vs Sue Lutter / Angela Wong3-6, 7-5, 0-1
2025-02-03vs Rockledge Rebels - MullowneySplit 11
L#1 DoublesMandy Smith / Tandy Baerst vs April Sanders / Katie Little6-7, 7-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesSacha Armstrong vs Jenny Mullowney6-3, 6-3
2025-01-27vs EFSC - LeiterLost 01
L#1 DoublesSharon Ford / Sacha Armstrong vs Meredith Christie / Bev Wilcocks3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2025-01-20vs RCCB - HingleLost 01
L#2 DoublesMarianne Fraser / Sacha Armstrong vs Ruthan Tattersall / Christy Galzerano1-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-01-13vs Suntree - MikaSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMandy Smith / Tandy Baerst vs Anastasia Mika / JENNIFER MALATINO6-1, 0-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSacha Armstrong / Amy McCleery vs Carri Grady / Rebecca Thompson6-1, 6-3
2025-01-06vs Kiwanis - FordWon 10
W#1 DoublesMandy Smith / Sacha Armstrong vs Lesa Haas / Connie Sicilia6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 40 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.65 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.99
Sacha Armstrong
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published
2.86
Chrissy James
published 3
2.80
Mandy Smith
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Amy McCleery
published 3
2.66
Janice Waltmeyer
published
2.65
Caroline Jiborn
published 3
2.53
Laura Breisch
published
2.48
JANETTE TABOR
published 3
2.46
Wendy Paul
published
2.43
Marianne Fraser
published
Tandy Baerst
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sacha Armstrong + Mandy Smith5165% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sacha Armstrong
42W–28L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%54%46%
2.99
3
Chrissy James
10W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%85%15%
2.86
Mandy Smith
90W–80L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Amy McCleery
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Janice Waltmeyer
1W–5L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%<1%
2.66
3
Caroline Jiborn
5W–3L career · no lines in 2025
13%87%<1%
2.65
Laura Breisch
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
2.53
3
JANETTE TABOR
6W–6L career · no lines in 2025
57%43%<1%
2.48
Wendy Paul
14W–5L career · no lines in 2025
0%63%37%
2.46
Marianne Fraser
2W–8L career · no lines in 2025
0%71%29%
2.43
Tandy Baerst
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.