Teams

LCTA18/Stuart/Legend Oaks

2022 LCTA 18 & Over Fall League · 18 & over Fall League Women 3.5 Night

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2023-10-19vs LCTA18/Kubu/Snee FarmWon 20
W#1 DoublesLaura Christiansen / Lindsay Milo vs Karen Harmon / Jennifer Mathis6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDenise Perry / Heather Wayne vs Della Barnhill / Jean Fifield6-2, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & over Fall League Women 3.5 Night have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
Lindsay Milo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.54
Jeanette Stuart
published
3.50
Faye MacKall
published 3.5
3.41
Laura Christiansen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.30
Stephanie Spinks
published
3.21
AYNSLEY HADLEY
published 3.5
3.13
Heather Wayne
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.05
Laura Doerr
published
3.03
Denise Perry
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.96
Sherry Doran
published
2.94
Susanne Wimberly
published
Joanne Nelson
published
Nancy Meier
published
Sara Gamble
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Heather Wayne + Susanne Wimberly5067% games+12.8% vs expected
Stephanie Spinks + Joanne Nelson5063% games+7.0% vs expected
Heather Wayne + Denise Perry4451% games−1.4% vs expected
Heather Wayne + Laura Doerr3650% games−5.0% vs expected
Sherry Doran + Laura Christiansen2449% games−7.3% vs expected
Denise Perry + Laura Doerr3345% games−7.5% vs expected
Sherry Doran + Jeanette Stuart5253% games−9.7% vs expected
Faye MacKall + Joanne Nelson5160% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lindsay Milo
86W–38L career · 1 line in 2022
<1%57%43%
3.98
Jeanette Stuart
99W–30L career · no lines in 2022
<1%38%62%
3.54
3.5
Faye MacKall
108W–26L career · no lines in 2022
<1%51%49%
3.50
Laura Christiansen
57W–28L career · 1 line in 2022
<1%75%25%
3.41
Stephanie Spinks
46W–34L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
AYNSLEY HADLEY
13W–22L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.21
3.5
Heather Wayne
36W–34L career · 1 line in 2022
15%85%<1%
3.13
Laura Doerr
43W–29L career · no lines in 2022
36%64%<1%
3.05
3.5
Denise Perry
26W–29L career · 1 line in 2022
41%59%<1%
3.03
Sherry Doran
23W–25L career · no lines in 2022
63%37%<1%
2.96
Susanne Wimberly
17W–23L career · no lines in 2022
<1%68%32%
2.94
Joanne Nelson
86W–22L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Nancy Meier
7W–24L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Sara Gamble
13W–15L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.