Teams

Liberty Park Tennis-Stacey/Ewing

2023 Fall Outdoor League-Saturday · 3.5W

19 players · average NTRP 3.64 / UTAH

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-10-22Won 20
W#2 DoublesJennie Stacey / Sara Ray vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesLisa Ewing / Ann Trentman vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-10-14vs Ogden-MouldingWon 10
W#3 DoublesLili Leiataua Iosefa / Hayley Shaffer vs Tracee Kemp / Wendy Johnstun5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2023-10-07vs Liberty Park Tennis-DaySplit 11
W#1 DoublesAnn Trentman / Sara Ray vs Lori Wilson / JaNean Nelson6-1, 6-4
L#1 SinglesJennie Stacey vs Bessy Nielson1-6, 5-7
2023-09-23vs Sports Mall-ThompsonLost 04
L#1 DoublesLisa Ewing / Carolee Romney vs DeeAnn Henderson / Erin Bradley6-7, 6-1, 0-1
L#1 SinglesSara Ray vs Jennifer Sampson4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAnn Trentman / LaNece Andreason vs Britany Egan / Claudine Finlay6-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesLili Leiataua Iosefa / Hayley Shaffer vs Yoko Walljasper / Stacy Criddle3-6, 6-7
2023-09-16vs Liberty Park Tennis-TaylorWon 21
W#1 DoublesSarah Villareal / Kristen Treanor vs Maria Lombardi / Sarah Love6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSara Ray / Alison Beesley vs Alena Taylor / Malisa Bowen6-4, 7-6
L#3 DoublesHeather Sliwa / Julia Dunn vs Mithona Nielsen / Jennifer Sweat6-7, 4-6
2023-09-09Won 20
W#1 DoublesJanis Turley / Carolee Romney vs Elizabeth West / Chris Peterson6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesJennie Stacey vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-08-26vs Liberty Park Tennis-LeikenLost 01
L#3 DoublesCarolee Romney / LaNece Andreason vs Brooke McCloskey / Dawn Farrell3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5W have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.32
Stephanie Walzer
published 4.5
3.47
Janis Turley
published
3.38
Sarah Villareal
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.38
Sara Ray
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.27
Lisa Ewing
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Alison Beesley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Carolee Romney
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.24
Jennifer Wecker
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.24
Heather Sliwa
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.23
Jennie Stacey
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.21
Julia Dunn
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.21
Ann Trentman
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.17
Sarah Law
published
3.07
Allison Leishman
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.03
Hayley Shaffer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Kelly LaFrance
published
Kristen Treanor
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
LaNece Andreason
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Lili Leiataua Iosefa
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ann Trentman + Lisa Ewing5257% games+8.5% vs expected
Jennie Stacey + Sara Ray3260% games+7.9% vs expected
Jennie Stacey + Kristen Treanor6353% games+7.2% vs expected
Sarah Law + Sarah Villareal3448% games+6.3% vs expected
Jennie Stacey + Allison Leishman4551% games+5.2% vs expected
Ann Trentman + Heather Sliwa6751% games+4.4% vs expected
Allison Leishman + Sara Ray2551% games+2.3% vs expected
Ann Trentman + Allison Leishman4443% games+1.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Stephanie Walzer
82W–43L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%10%
4.32
Janis Turley
27W–15L career · no lines in 2023
<1%57%43%
3.47
Sarah Villareal
38W–27L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%80%20%
3.38
Sara Ray
88W–102L career · 2 lines in 2023
81%19%<1%
3.38
Lisa Ewing
123W–122L career · 1 line in 2023
2%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Alison Beesley
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Carolee Romney
134W–164L career · 3 lines in 2023
4%93%4%
3.25
Jennifer Wecker
92W–47L career · 1 line in 2023
4%93%3%
3.24
Heather Sliwa
82W–61L career · 1 line in 2023
5%92%3%
3.24
3.5
Jennie Stacey
153W–129L career · 3 lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.23
Julia Dunn
19W–32L career · 1 line in 2023
6%92%2%
3.21
3.5
Ann Trentman
185W–245L career · 3 lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.21
Sarah Law
82W–85L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Allison Leishman
132W–209L career · 3 lines in 2023
31%69%<1%
3.07
3.5
Hayley Shaffer
77W–57L career · 2 lines in 2023
42%58%<1%
3.03
Kelly LaFrance
8W–9L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kristen Treanor
40W–61L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
LaNece Andreason
41W–85L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Lili Leiataua Iosefa
36W–45L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.