Teams

LLW-CV-Indian Wells TG/Giles

2023 SoCal Doubles - CV · CV Men's 4.0

9 players · average NTRP 4.12 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2023-12-16vs CV-Palm Springs TC/ForrestWon 10
W#2 DoublesC Collins / Steven Wilkins vs Jasen Texeira / Danny Hitt6-2, 6-3
2023-10-28Won 10
W#3 DoublesSteven Wilkins / Kevin Meraz vs Steven Somers / Marty Goldhaber6-3, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for CV Men's 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.76 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Harrison Hought
published 4.5
4.00
John Prahl
published
Dean Nguyen
published 4
3.73
Steven Wilkins
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.71
C Collins
published 4
3.60
Craig Ellis
published 4
Janard Lansangan
published
Kevin Meraz
published
Mike Tamaki
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Harrison Hought + Janard Lansangan6073% games+10.8% vs expected
Steven Wilkins + C Collins2347% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Harrison Hought
12W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
John Prahl
11W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%50%50%
4.00
4
Dean Nguyen
3W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Steven Wilkins
18W–34L career · 2 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.73
4
C Collins
4W–8L career · no lines in 2023
5%93%1%
3.71
4
Craig Ellis
4W–9L career · no lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.60
Janard Lansangan
6W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kevin Meraz
8W–15L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Mike Tamaki
0W–10L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.