Teams

Creekstone (Danie van den Heever)*

USTA Atlanta Summer - 18 & Over Men - Regular · 5.0 Men (Zach Moore)

11 players · average NTRP 5.00 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 5.0 Men (Zach Moore) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.77 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.92
4.91
Andre Ferreira
published 5
4.88
Kevin Ye
published
4.87
Gustavo Anzola
published
4.75
Evgeniy Vinogradov
published
4.74
Jonathan Sutjiadi
published
4.71
Inus Daneel
published
4.68
Adrian Ooi
published 5
4.65
Nicolas Howe
published
4.61
Gert van Den Heever
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Danie van Den Heever + Gert van Den Heever6156% games−5.3% vs expected
Gustavo Anzola + Andre Ferreira213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Danie van Den Heever
16W–1L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.92
5
Andre Ferreira
6W–1L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.91
Kevin Ye
10W–3L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.88
Gustavo Anzola
17W–10L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.87
Evgeniy Vinogradov
17W–2L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.75
Jonathan Sutjiadi
7W–2L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.74
Inus Daneel
8W–3L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.71
5
Adrian Ooi
13W–9L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.68
Nicolas Howe
9W–2L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.65
Gert van Den Heever
6W–2L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.61
Luis Rafael Sanchez Sierra
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.