Teams

Hermitage Lines Lobbers

2025 Richmond Doubles Weeknight Women · Richmond Doubles Weeknight 7.0 Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.60 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-06-10vs Westnuts - Shudtz 7.0Won 10
W#1 DoublesAMY LINES / Elizabeth Wiertel vs Hayley Herrin / Meghan Dexter6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2025-04-28vs RMC-Sweeney 7.0Won 21
W#1 DoublesLesley Alouf / Susan Mangin vs Rashelle Hayes / Mary Spagnolo6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKrysten Bishop / Stacey Haug vs Amy Scherer / Julie Scott5-7, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRenee Fisher / Jennifer Morgan vs Kimberly Garrett / Lynne Moore6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2025-04-14vs MAC Machine - Jepson 7.0Won 10
W#2 DoublesAMY LINES / Andrea Broughton vs Lidia Cousins / Robin Meyer6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Doubles Weeknight 7.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.97
AMY LINES
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.84
Abbey Orski
published 4
3.63
Kathleen Crotty
published
3.54
Joanna Bergeron
published
3.33
Charlotte Caporale
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.29
Sarah Martin
published
3.29
Andrea Broughton
published 3.5
3.15
Lauren Hutcheson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.04
Kimberly Ross
published
3.02
Renee Fisher
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.92
2.92
Stacey Haug
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Krysten Bishop
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Lesley Alouf
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Susan Mangin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elizabeth Wiertel + Stacey Haug3256% games+11.5% vs expected
Stacey Haug + Lauren Hutcheson3254% games+4.5% vs expected
Sarah Martin + Renee Fisher213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
AMY LINES
220W–87L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
3.97
4
Abbey Orski
15W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%89%11%
3.84
Kathleen Crotty
19W–11L career · no lines in 2025
15%85%<1%
3.63
Joanna Bergeron
18W–10L career · no lines in 2025
38%62%<1%
3.54
3.5
Charlotte Caporale
36W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.33
Sarah Martin
15W–8L career · no lines in 2025
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Andrea Broughton
23W–15L career · no lines in 2025
1%94%5%
3.29
Lauren Hutcheson
21W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%12%88%
3.15
Kimberly Ross
11W–5L career · no lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
3.04
Renee Fisher
4W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
42%58%<1%
3.02
3
Elizabeth Wiertel
29W–21L career · no lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
2.92
Stacey Haug
20W–20L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%74%26%
2.92
Krysten Bishop
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Lesley Alouf
7W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Susan Mangin
2W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.