Teams

RID BOYDSTON

2025 FW USTA Winter Social 18+ Ladies - N · A

7 players · average NTRP 3.70 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-02-14vs CCP ASAADWon 20
W#1 DoublesDrew Brigati / Samantha Daggett vs Ulrike Laux / Dina Hancock7-6, 7-5
W#2 DoublesEmily Boydston / Brittany Thompson vs Gina Johnson / Audrey Baker6-3, 6-1
2025-01-24vs CCP ASAADWon 10
W#2 DoublesEmily Boydston / Drew Brigati vs Ulrike Laux / Briana Hipps6-4, 6-2
2025-01-17vs BIR CURTISWon 21
L#1 DoublesDrew Brigati / Katherine Graham vs Molly Pruner / Carrie Hoogendoorn2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#1 SinglesSamantha Daggett vs Heather Steele Curtis7-6, 6-4
W#2 DoublesEmily Boydston / Brittany Thompson vs Jennifer Curley / Jana Stokes6-0, 6-1
2025-01-03vs CCP ASAADLost 02
L#1 DoublesEmily Boydston / Sarah Grimmer vs Holly Friedman / Nicole Eschliman1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesBritni McDaniel / Brittany Evans vs Christine Gerhard / Katarina Jacquemard2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for A have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.65
Katherine Graham
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.64
Drew Brigati
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.61
Emily Boydston
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.57
Samantha Daggett
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.37
Britni McDaniel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.37
Amanda Sevier
published 3.5
3.20
Brittany Evans
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Emily Boydston + Britni McDaniel6264% games+11.6% vs expected
Emily Boydston + Drew Brigati3249% games+1.5% vs expected
Brittany Evans + Britni McDaniel2545% games−0.7% vs expected
Drew Brigati + Katherine Graham044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Katherine Graham
3W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
13%87%<1%
3.65
4
Drew Brigati
18W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
14%85%<1%
3.64
4
Emily Boydston
21W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.61
Samantha Daggett
9W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.57
3.5
Britni McDaniel
20W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%84%15%
3.37
3.5
Amanda Sevier
13W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%85%15%
3.37
3.5
Brittany Evans
14W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
7%92%1%
3.20

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.