Teams

Stonebrook

2023 Shenandoah Adult 40 & Over Weekend Women · Shenandoah Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Women WEEKEND

11 players · average NTRP 3.07 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-07-15vs MiddleburgWon 10
W#2 DoublesAnn Pawlak / Debora Aldridge vs Elle Sullivant / Laura Paddock6-4, 5-6
2023-07-02vs MiddleburgWon 20
W#2 DoublesDebora Aldridge / Ann Pawlak vs Wendy Heuer / Elle Sullivant6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMary Broy / Svetlana Hanson vs Catherine Moore / Katherine Grady6-4, 6-3
2023-06-24Won 10
W#2 DoublesDesiree Kardashian / Robin Sweet vs Melanie Parks / Monika Bajaj7-6, 6-5
2023-06-23vs All About that AceLost 01
L#2 DoublesMary Broy / Desiree Kardashian vs Laura McNicholl / Jennifer Leibold1-6, 1-6
2023-06-18vs All About that AceLost 01
L#1 DoublesDebora Aldridge / Robin Sweet vs Phyllis Corley / Kate Trask2-6, 1-6
2023-06-17vs MiddleburgLost 01
L#1 DoublesDesiree Kardashian / Heather Saville vs Deborah Williams / Kathryn Menchion3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Shenandoah Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Women WEEKEND have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.84 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Kristen Pettrone
published
3.25
Anna Allen
published 3.5
2.92
Carrie Keyes
published 3
2.83
Mary Broy
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.80
Svetlana Hanson
published
2.78
Heather Saville
published 3
2.73
Ann Pawlak
published 3
2.67
Debora Aldridge
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.63
Shirley McInturff
published
2.42
Desiree Kardashian
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Mary Serock
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Desiree Kardashian + Debora Aldridge4738% games−17.5% vs expected
Desiree Kardashian + Mary Broy2540% gamesnot enough data
Heather Saville + Mary Broy213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kristen Pettrone
5W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%84%16%
3.37
3.5
Anna Allen
29W–21L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.25
3
Carrie Keyes
4W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
2.92
3
Mary Broy
58W–63L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%90%9%
2.83
Svetlana Hanson
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Heather Saville
2W–5L career · no lines in 2023
1%94%5%
2.78
3
Ann Pawlak
3W–1L career · type A · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Debora Aldridge
82W–159L career · 3 lines in 2023
9%90%1%
2.67
Shirley McInturff
1W–5L career · no lines in 2023
>99%<1%<1%
2.63
3
Desiree Kardashian
36W–75L career · 3 lines in 2023
74%26%<1%
2.42
Mary Serock
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.