Teams

Trenton Country Club

Adult 18 & Over Spring · 2.5 Women Central Day

6 players · average NTRP / NEW JERSEY

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-06-19vs NJD/Nassau HoneybeesLost 12
L#1 DoublesSamantha Celli / Stacy Mattia vs Seda Demirbilek / Fatima Iqbal2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesKerry Nickels vs Aysegul Topcu4-6, 1-5
W#2 DoublesKate Wilson / Kelly Soto vs Meredith Mian / Cindy Roros4-2
2026-06-12vs Nassau Alley CatsLost 12
L#1 DoublesKristen Garufi / Kate Wilson vs Erika Verschelde / Hiral Soni3-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesKerry Nickels vs Renee Mancuso6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesStacy Mattia / Kelly Soto vs Lynn Mesina / Minna Yu2-6, 6-7
2026-05-29vs NJD/Nassau HoneybeesSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKate Wilson / Samantha Celli vs Shula Melker / Karen Reddington2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKristen Garufi / Stacy Mattia vs Anna Osintseva / Erin Ranjo4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2026-05-22vs Nassau Alley CatsLost 02
L#1 DoublesStacy Mattia / Kristen Young vs Hiral Soni / Payal Patel1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesSamantha Celli / Kelly Soto vs Rebecca DePorte / Lynn Mesina4-6, 3-6
2026-05-08vs NJD/Nassau HoneybeesLost 02
L#1 DoublesSamantha Celli / Kristen Young vs Karen Reddington / Cindy Roros4-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesKerry Nickels vs Aysegul Topcu4-6, 4-5
2026-05-01vs Nassau Alley CatsLost 02
L#1 DoublesKelly Soto / Kristen Garufi vs Erika Verschelde / Renee Mancuso1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSamantha Celli / Stacy Mattia vs Kellie Collins / Lynn Mesina4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · 2.5 Women Central Day
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Forehand Friends010282253401
2PRC Deuce Defenders010173369490
3Trenton Country Club010123880529
4SPRING CENTRAL 1/Jersey Slammers01149518312
5SPRING CENTRAL 2/PTP Mavericks011431231369
6Topspinners011351943400
7PRC Prime011223375524
8Princeton Dawgs011154088583
9Edison Aces011144190574

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.14 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.76
Kristen Young
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.22
Kerry Nickels
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.03
Samantha Celli
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.01
Kelly Soto
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
1.95
Kristen Garufi
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
1.86
Stacy Mattia
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kristen Young
1W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%3%97%
2.76
Kerry Nickels
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.22
Samantha Celli
1W–12L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.03
Kelly Soto
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.01
Kristen Garufi
1W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.95
Stacy Mattia
1W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.86

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.