Teams

Love the Battle

2022 USTA Adult 18 & Over · Women 3.5 - 18 & Over

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MONTANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-06-19vs Montana/Roberts/18&Over3.5WSplit 22
W#1 DoublesMolly Ogle / Olivia Gregory vs Amy Johnson / Carla Luck7-5, 7-6
W#2 DoublesLori Faure / Annelise Torgerson vs Jill Roberts / Sally Lentz3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 SinglesSuzanne Taylor vs Heather Monson1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDIANA RAIMONDO / Tina Ovnic vs Shelby Clegg / Elizabeth Suh6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2022-06-19vs Hot ShotzWon 32
L#1 DoublesMolly Ogle / Suzanne Taylor vs Maria King / Cassie Springer4-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesTina Ovnic vs Amy Berghold4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLori Faure / Annelise Torgerson vs Danielle Sebastian / Kara Fellows-Tripp6-2, 6-2
W#2 SinglesOlivia Gregory vs Melanie Maganias6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJulia Haggerty / Laura Toepfer vs Susie Boyer / Kelley Dowdell7-6, 2-6, 0-1
2022-06-18vs Baby Got BackhandWon 50
W#1 DoublesMolly Ogle / Olivia Gregory vs Sisi Carroll / Michelle Enslow6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesKatie Muenzberg vs Michaela Wolfinger3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDIANA RAIMONDO / Tina Ovnic vs Nola Bingham / Karrie Sherman6-3, 6-3
W#2 SinglesLori Faure vs Alice Santos6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJulia Haggerty / Suzanne Taylor vs Jennifer Brunsdon / Wendy Clark6-4, 6-3
2022-06-18vs Baby Got BackhandWon 50
W#1 DoublesMolly Ogle / Olivia Gregory vs Jennifer Brunsdon / Wendy Clark6-2, 7-5
W#1 SinglesKatie Muenzberg vs Dina Wandler6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDIANA RAIMONDO / Suzanne Taylor vs Alice Santos / Michelle Enslow6-3, 6-4
W#2 SinglesAnnelise Torgerson vs Michaela Wolfinger6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJody Olsen / Laura Toepfer vs Nola Bingham / Karrie Sherman6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2022-06-17vs Montana/Roberts/18&Over3.5WLost 23
L#1 DoublesOlivia Gregory / Lori Faure vs Amy Johnson / Hailey Kern4-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesMolly Ogle vs Heather Monson4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJody Olsen / Laura Toepfer vs Shelby Clegg / Elizabeth Suh6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesSuzanne Taylor vs Fernanda Boyer6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesTina Ovnic / Annelise Torgerson vs Karen Spierling / Sheila Schaub6-2, 6-0
2022-06-17vs Hot ShotzWon 32
W#1 DoublesTina Ovnic / Suzanne Taylor vs Susie Boyer / Kelley Dowdell6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesKatie Muenzberg vs Katherine Gaddis4-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesAnnelise Torgerson / Lori Faure vs Cassie Springer / Maria King6-1, 6-4
L#2 SinglesDIANA RAIMONDO vs Amy Berghold6-1, 0-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJody Olsen / Laura Toepfer vs Danielle Sebastian / Kara Fellows-Tripp7-5, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.5 - 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Annelise Torgerson
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.27
Lori Faure
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.27
Tina Ovnic
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.24
DIANA RAIMONDO
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.19
Julia Haggerty
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.09
Suzanne Taylor
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Jody Olsen
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Katie Muenzberg
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Laura Toepfer
published
Molly Ogle
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
Olivia Gregory
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Molly Ogle + Olivia Gregory10263% games+17.9% vs expected
Suzanne Taylor + DIANA RAIMONDO6260% games+9.2% vs expected
Suzanne Taylor + Annelise Torgerson3355% games+8.9% vs expected
Suzanne Taylor + Julia Haggerty7753% games+4.4% vs expected
DIANA RAIMONDO + Tina Ovnic6753% games+0.4% vs expected
Lori Faure + Annelise Torgerson7255% games−0.9% vs expected
Suzanne Taylor + Tina Ovnic12751% games−1.3% vs expected
Lori Faure + Julia Haggerty3549% games−6.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Annelise Torgerson
26W–20L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
3.37
3.5
Lori Faure
28W–39L career · 5 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Tina Ovnic
34W–37L career · 5 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
DIANA RAIMONDO
43W–54L career · 4 lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Julia Haggerty
15W–31L career · 2 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Suzanne Taylor
43W–46L career · 6 lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
3.09
Jody Olsen
3W–2L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Katie Muenzberg
7W–8L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Laura Toepfer
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Molly Ogle
17W–7L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Olivia Gregory
14W–9L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.