Teams

LEBTC TEAL

2025 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-05-26vs HG REDWon 31
W#1 DoublesJade Braithwaite / Molly Stephens vs Katie Johnson / Betsy Agnvall6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAmy Foreman / Kristin Wiedmaier vs Jennifer Gruidel / Lisa McCausland6-4, 6-3
L#2 SinglesNicole Gallagher vs Charity Aslin4-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesKatie Kline / Jennifer Sekulski-Barton vs Leslie Suh / Jena Greer6-1, 6-3
2025-05-19vs KNO REDLost 13
L#1 SinglesMolly Stephens vs Jodi Page6-7, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAmy Foreman / Nicole Gallagher vs Jennifer Muller / Linda Prudhomme4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 SinglesKristin Wiedmaier vs Cathy Nowak3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesAnnie Kim / Marci Kucharyson vs Jacqueline Schultz / Karla Goodhart6-2, 6-0
2025-05-12vs SS-D REDSplit 22
L#1 DoublesJade Braithwaite / Kathy Hoskins vs Sara Knudsen / Stacey Williams4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAmy Foreman / Nicole Gallagher vs Meg Benedik / Jessica Asherin7-6, 6-4
W#2 SinglesMarci Kucharyson vs Diana Treinen7-5, 7-6
L#3 DoublesJennifer Sekulski-Barton / Katie Kline vs Juli Furtek / Taylor Surroz0-6, 4-6
2025-05-05vs HW GREENSplit 22
L#1 DoublesNicole Gallagher / Katie Kline vs Brittany Norris / Karlie Boone1-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesMarci Kucharyson vs Melissa Long6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAnnie Kim / Kathy Hoskins vs Britta Beblavi / Katie Dulik3-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesJennifer Sekulski-Barton / Molly Stephens vs Kelly Lewis / Kristen Welsh1-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-04-28vs SS-H GREYWon 32
W#1 DoublesKathy Hoskins / Jade Braithwaite vs Sarah Erickson / Nicole Moore6-2, 7-6
L#1 SinglesMarci Kucharyson vs Laurie McElroy6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAnnie Kim / Katie Kline vs Brianna Gass / Sara Holmes6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesMolly Stephens vs Kimberlee Harmon4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAmy Foreman / Jennifer Sekulski-Barton vs Meaghan McGee / Jessica Stretz Storm7-5, 6-4
2025-04-21vs WC BLUEWon 31
L#1 DoublesKathy Hoskins / Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer vs Brooke Lorenz / Taryn Wilson1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesNicole Gallagher / Lori Wood vs Mary Brady / JESSICA MORTON6-2, 6-4
W#2 SinglesJennifer Sekulski-Barton vs Dani Calkins6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKatie Kline / Annie Kim vs Brigit McNair / Angela Jones6-4, 6-3
2025-04-14vs LTFC ORANGESplit 22
L#1 DoublesKathy Hoskins / Molly Stephens vs Jennifer Delaney / Debbie Murphy4-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesMarci Kucharyson vs Marissa Ogden6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesAmy Foreman / Colleen Roberts vs Elizabeth Stemper / Caren Swan4-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesJade Braithwaite / Annie Kim vs Sarah White / Ellen Ribes-Smith6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.87 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Marci Kucharyson
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
3.02
Colleen Roberts
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.93
Nicole Gallagher
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.83
Kathy Hoskins
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.78
Molly Stephens
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
2.76
Amy Foreman
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.75
Annie Kim
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.70
Kristin Wiedmaier
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
2.66
Jennifer Sekulski-Barton
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
Katie Kline
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amy Foreman + Nicole Gallagher4258% games+10.2% vs expected
Amy Foreman + Jennifer Sekulski-Barton224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Marci Kucharyson
31W–2L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.40
3
Colleen Roberts
10W–4L career · type A · 1 line in 2025
<1%44%56%
3.02
Nicole Gallagher
14W–6L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
2.93
Kathy Hoskins
17W–14L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%88%12%
2.83
Molly Stephens
15W–8L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Amy Foreman
19W–12L career · 5 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
2.76
3
Annie Kim
21W–9L career · 5 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
2.75
Kristin Wiedmaier
5W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
2.70
Jennifer Sekulski-Barton
15W–10L career · 5 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
2.66
Katie Kline
4W–6L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.