Teams

2 JRHS Colberg HotShots

2023 Richmond Adult 40 & Over Weekend · Richmond Adult 40 & Over 4.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 4.00 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-07-15vs 5 MRTC Williams-JonesWon 30
W#1 DoublesAna Adkins / Megan Shrestha vs Eunice Williams / Cindy Clark6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSara Manners / Kasey Hammond vs Christina Aeinan Kang / Dorota Sipko6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesHeather Colberg / Debbie Messmer vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-07-06vs 3 Belmont StewartSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDebbie Messmer / Mary Scott vs Rebecca Loos / Christine Polk2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesAna Adkins / Aimee Vaughn vs Paige Oostdyk / Victoria Bradt6-3, 6-1
2023-06-24vs 6 Westwood CosbySplit 11
L#1 DoublesAna Adkins / Leigh Ann Barker vs Ellie StJohn / Megan Alwine6-7, 4-5
W#2 DoublesKasey Hammond / Debbie Messmer vs Kelly Berry / Patricia Bishop6-2, 6-2
2023-06-17vs 4 Ridgetop AveryLost 02
L#1 DoublesTiffany Jeremiah / Ana Adkins vs Jeanine Wisor / Nicole Marks4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAddie Miller / Debbie Messmer vs Karen Williamson / Karen Franks2-6, 3-6
2023-06-11vs 7 RMC FlowersWon 10
W#1 DoublesAna Adkins / Tiffany Jeremiah vs Jennifer Owens / Pamla Dietz6-4, 6-2
2023-05-21vs 6 Westwood CosbyWon 10
W#2 DoublesDebbie Messmer / Kasey Hammond vs Rose Yuen / Heather Harker6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 40 & Over 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.72 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.00
Aimee Vaughn
published 4
3.95
Kristen Walton
published
3.87
Ana Adkins
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.82
Debbie Messmer
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.81
Kasey Hammond
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.71
Addie Miller
published 4
3.68
Megan Shrestha
published
3.66
Emily Hartman
published
3.65
Sara Manners
published
3.64
Leigh Ann Barker
published
3.45
Heather Colberg
published 4
3.38
Mary Scott
published
Tiffany Jeremiah
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kasey Hammond + Debbie Messmer6454% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Aimee Vaughn
39W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%49%51%
4.00
Kristen Walton
33W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%65%35%
3.95
4
Ana Adkins
135W–43L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%81%18%
3.87
4
Debbie Messmer
233W–155L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%89%10%
3.82
4
Kasey Hammond
71W–58L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%90%8%
3.81
4
Addie Miller
5W–3L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.71
Megan Shrestha
7W–6L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.68
Emily Hartman
9W–9L career · no lines in 2023
13%87%1%
3.66
Sara Manners
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
14%85%1%
3.65
Leigh Ann Barker
6W–14L career · no lines in 2023
16%84%1%
3.64
4
Heather Colberg
114W–88L career · no lines in 2023
65%35%<1%
3.45
Mary Scott
19W–11L career · no lines in 2023
80%20%<1%
3.38
Tiffany Jeremiah
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.