Teams

Fee - Rouveyrol

2026 Brevard Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women

11 players · average NTRP 2.83 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-06-04vs Kiwi - SalvatoreWon 10
W#2 DoublesLaura Rouveyrol / Katharyn Luer vs Yvonne Salvatore / Kathleen Groff6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2026-05-04vs EFSC - LeiterLost 01
L#1 DoublesLaura Rouveyrol / Katharyn Luer vs Julia Tulloch / Bonita Madden2-6, 1-6
2026-04-16vs Brevard/HingleLost 13
L#1 DoublesMilena Alicea / Kim Tice vs Dawn Green / Kerry Sawyer6-2, 0-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesBrooke Maratta vs Katherine Hingle4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKatharyn Luer / Laura Rouveyrol vs Lindsay Nichols / Tricia Patterson6-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJenifer Raymond / Kristi Swor vs Eileen Bentley / Morgan Bentley6-1, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.78 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.07
Jennifer Bailey
published
3.01
Kim Tice
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.91
Katharyn Luer
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.87
Brooke Maratta
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.81
Milena Alicea
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.79
Laura Rouveyrol
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.78
Kristi Swor
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.70
Michelle Dunn
published
2.52
Jenifer Raymond
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.37
Courtney McCaleb
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 2.5
Mikayla Lewin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura Rouveyrol + Katharyn Luer134 matchesnot enough data
Kristi Swor + Jenifer Raymond213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Bailey
2W–14L career · no lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
3.07
Kim Tice
5W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%48%52%
3.01
3
Katharyn Luer
158W–172L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
2.91
3
Brooke Maratta
3W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%82%17%
2.87
Milena Alicea
12W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
1%90%9%
2.81
Laura Rouveyrol
16W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
2%92%6%
2.79
Kristi Swor
6W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
2%92%5%
2.78
Michelle Dunn
12W–12L career · no lines in 2026
7%91%2%
2.70
Jenifer Raymond
17W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
0%44%56%
2.52
2.5
Courtney McCaleb
3W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
0%82%18%
2.37
Mikayla Lewin
1W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.