Teams

Wisehaven - DW's Revenge

2024 Central Penn Tri-Level League · 5.0 Men - Tri Level

15 players · average NTRP 4.36 / CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-12-19vs RCW - MusserWon 21
W#1 DoublesPhilip Myers / Choopat Suvimolstean vs Jared D Howat / Peter Landis6-4, 7-6
W#2 DoublesAdam Hack / Tom Brink vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesJoseph Kirchner / Parker Sanders vs Elliott Kleckner / Noah Ginder7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2024-12-19vs RCW - MusserWon 21
W#1 DoublesPhilip Myers / Choopat Suvimolstean vs Dave Musser / Lukas Stierling4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesNathan Gambino / Henry McVeigh vs Paul Elliott / John Kitsock4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesJason Phillips / Nicholas Jones vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-12-19Won 20
W#2 DoublesMikesh Desai / Henry McVeigh vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesDevin Long / Ryan Sabados vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-11-17vs Hempfield - ArtersWon 21
W#1 DoublesPhilip Myers / Choopat Suvimolstean vs Lamar Jackson / Mark Marini6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAdam Hack / Tom Brink vs Chad Furst / Tyler Spinello5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDevin Long / Parker Sanders vs Eric Weitzel / Ryan Weitzel6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2024-11-10vs Hempfield - ArtersWon 30
W#1 DoublesPhilip Myers / Choopat Suvimolstean vs Mark Wojciechowski / Mark Marini6-1, 7-6
W#2 DoublesNathan Gambino / Adam Hack vs Blake Martin / Tyler Spinello6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesRyan Sabados / Joseph Kirchner vs Ryan Weitzel / Eric Weitzel7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2024-10-14vs RCW - MusserLost 12
W#1 DoublesPhilip Myers / Choopat Suvimolstean vs Dave Musser / Peter Landis4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAdam Hack / Henry McVeigh vs Dale Beshore / Andrew Clark6-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJason Phillips / Nicholas Jones vs Elliott Kleckner / Dylan Ryan4-6, 3-6
2024-10-13vs Hempfield - ArtersWon 30
W#1 DoublesPhilip Myers / Choopat Suvimolstean vs Lamar Jackson / Mark Marini6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesHenry McVeigh / Mikesh Desai vs Mark Wojciechowski / Tyler Spinello6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesHunter Jones / Parker Sanders vs Jeffery Arters / Matthew Hanna6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2024-09-22vs Hempfield - ArtersWon 21
W#1 DoublesPhilip Myers / Lee Kennedy vs Lamar Jackson / Mark Marini6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesNathan Gambino / Mikesh Desai vs Chad Furst / Mark Wojciechowski6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJason Phillips / Hunter Jones vs Ryan Weitzel / Jeffery Arters6-3, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.0 Men - Tri Level have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.93 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Choopat Suvimolstean
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.56
Henry McVeigh
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.38
Tom Brink
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.23
Adam Hack
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.11
Nathan Gambino
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.84
Hunter Jones
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.83
Joseph Kirchner
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.71
Ryan Sabados
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.68
Jason Phillips
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.47
Parker Sanders
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published
3.46
Devin Long
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
Lee Kennedy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Mikesh Desai
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Nicholas Jones
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
Philip Myers
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Philip Myers + Choopat Suvimolstean8063% games+14.9% vs expected
Nicholas Jones + Hunter Jones5069% games+12.6% vs expected
Devin Long + Ryan Sabados3352% games+10.9% vs expected
Tom Brink + Adam Hack7065% games+9.0% vs expected
Devin Long + Jason Phillips4349% games+4.3% vs expected
Hunter Jones + Ryan Sabados4254% games+0.2% vs expected
Devin Long + Nicholas Jones4552% gamesnot enough data
Joseph Kirchner + Ryan Sabados4158% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Choopat Suvimolstean
10W–0L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data
4.5
Henry McVeigh
170W–51L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%33%67%
4.56
4.5
Tom Brink
249W–144L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
4.38
4.5
Adam Hack
80W–36L career · 9 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
4.23
Nathan Gambino
42W–14L career · 3 lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
4.11
Hunter Jones
47W–15L career · 4 lines in 2024
87%13%<1%
3.84
Joseph Kirchner
53W–32L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%88%11%
3.83
4
Ryan Sabados
82W–54L career · 6 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.71
4
Jason Phillips
91W–80L career · 6 lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.68
Parker Sanders
16W–14L career · 10 lines in 2024
59%41%<1%
3.47
4
Devin Long
24W–57L career · 4 lines in 2024
63%37%<1%
3.46
Lee Kennedy
5W–4L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Mikesh Desai
15W–7L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Nicholas Jones
62W–27L career · 8 lines in 2024
not enough data
Philip Myers
43W–16L career · 7 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.