Teams

garrity-natchez

2025 Adult 55 & Over-SW · Men 3.5

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-04-19vs BrookavenSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDick Whitaker / Danny Huffines vs Greg Ryan / Mark Giust2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJim Ferguson / Curren Pitre vs Coney Lea / Chad Oberschmidt6-2, 6-2
2025-04-12vs BrookavenWon 20
W#1 DoublesGeorge Mayers / Joe Garrity vs Coney Lea / Greg Ryan7-5, 7-5
W#2 DoublesCurren Pitre / Eli Whitaker vs Sam Oldham / Robert Fisher6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2025-04-05vs BrookavenWon 21
W#1 DoublesDanny Huffines / Dick Whitaker vs Greg Ryan / Mark Giust6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesMichael Schilling / Curren Pitre vs Sam Oldham / Robert Fisher6-4, 0-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesGeorge Mayers / Rodney Terral vs Coney Lea / Chad Oberschmidt7-5, 6-1
2025-03-22vs BrookavenWon 21
L#1 DoublesJim Ferguson / Curren Pitre vs Robert Fisher / Sam Oldham4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesEli Whitaker / Michael Schilling vs Chad Oberschmidt / Coney Lea6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJoe Garrity / George Mayers vs Greg Ryan / Mark Giust6-3, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Dick Whitaker
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.35
Danny Huffines
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.32
Rodney Terral
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.30
Michael Schilling
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.28
Curren Pitre
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.19
Joe Garrity
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Eli Whitaker
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
George Mayers
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Jim Ferguson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Dick Whitaker
12W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%37%63%
3.54
3.5
Danny Huffines
8W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%85%14%
3.35
Rodney Terral
30W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
Michael Schilling
7W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Curren Pitre
8W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
Joe Garrity
7W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
Eli Whitaker
4W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
George Mayers
6W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jim Ferguson
3W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.