Teams

B IND:Alper Gurses

2024 NH Adult 18 & Over Men Singles Flex Fall · 3.0 Men 1

1 player · average NTRP 3.00 / NEW HAMPSHIRE

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2023-10-08vs A LNH:Abdullah NaumanLost 01
L#1 SinglesAlper Gurses vs Abdullah Nauman4-6, 2-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · 3.0 Men 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1A YMCA:Aditya Gore4040012
2A LNH:Abdullah Nauman3232441
3YMCA:Rajesh Manoharan2121221
4B IND:Raman Chakravarthy101005
5B IND:Alper Gurses0101212
6B YMCA:Joseph Martin0202424
7A EXE:Tim Geist0404848

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.89 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.89
Alper Gurses
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Alper Gurses
23W–15L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%78%22%
2.89

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.