Teams

Gr8t Salukis

Mixed 18 & Over · 8.0 North Mixed Doubles

7 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NEW JERSEY

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2020-11-21vs 8.0 Chester MixWon 10
W#1 DoublesJaclyn Kulich / Jorge Vergara vs Takako Komatsuzaki / Asim Burman6-4, 6-0
2020-11-07vs Hot Mix 8.0Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMary Chion / Nui Chan vs Izabela Duda / Ravi Vaidyanathan2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2020-10-31vs NJD/Mixed UpLost 02
L#1 DoublesDavid Nguyen / Meng Zhang vs Danielle Nappi / Paul Vecchio7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesNui Chan / Mary Chion vs Elise Gerdes / Stephen Khoo0-6, 3-6
2020-10-25vs Mixed Up IISplit 11
L#1 DoublesLaura Fiske / Mohan Duggi vs Sue Pangis / Gerald Sarmiento1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesMary Chion / Nui Chan vs Jayamadhuri Ghosh / DAISUKE SUZUKI7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2020-10-17vs 8.0 Chester MixLost 02
L#1 DoublesMeng Zhang / David Nguyen vs Cassandra Malone / Arunrahul Nallaswami3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLaura Fiske / Mohan Duggi vs Takako Komatsuzaki / Dario Pompili2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2020-10-17vs Hot Mix 8.0Lost 01
L#3 DoublesMeng Zhang / Paul Ricciardi vs Ramaswami Venkatesh / Janet Bellaran5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2020-09-26vs NJD/Mixed UpLost 02
L#1 DoublesNui Chan / Mary Chion vs Jon Rubinstein / Kimberly Mark4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLaura Fiske / David Nguyen vs Philip Oh / Ashley Friedman2-6, 5-6
2020-09-19vs Mixed Up IILost 02
L#1 DoublesMeng Zhang / David Nguyen vs Manju Adusumilli / Dan Khoo6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMary Chion / Nui Chan vs Jennifer Martz / Daniel Higgins0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 8.0 North Mixed Doubles
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NJD/Mixed Up0819513168
28.0 Chester Mix0816820176
3Hot Mix 8.008101432227
4Mixed Up II0891533238
5Gr8t Salukis0861838253

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.85 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Mary Chion
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.79
Laura Fiske
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
Jaclyn Kulich
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Meng Zhang
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Mohan Duggi
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Nui Chan
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Paul Ricciardi
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura Fiske + Mohan Duggi21035% games−5.9% vs expected
Nui Chan + Mary Chion151352% games−12.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Mary Chion
207W–101L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%73%27%
3.92
4
Laura Fiske
121W–91L career · 3 lines in 2021
1%94%5%
3.79
Jaclyn Kulich
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data
Meng Zhang
18W–29L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Mohan Duggi
45W–45L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Nui Chan
59W–38L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Paul Ricciardi
41W–49L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.