Teams

6 Kanawha Crushers - Carpenter

2025 Richmond Singles · Richmond Singles 2.5 Men

8 players · average NTRP 2.75 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
L#1 SinglesJared Dunn vs Julius Thomas4-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesBrennan Quinby vs Eric Meadows6-1, 6-0
W#3 SinglesBarry Haneberg vs Larry Butler6-1, 6-1
2025-10-20vs 8 Lakeside Club - King 2.5Won 30
W#1 SinglesJonathan Kaufmann vs Keary Shaub6-0, 6-2
W#2 SinglesTravers Edwards vs Jon Markham6-4, 6-1
W#3 SinglesDavid Carpenter vs Joshua Bartels6-2, 6-1
2025-10-13vs 1 WW Ace Holes - WalekLost 12
W#1 SinglesPatrick Harding vs Joshua James6-0, 6-0
L#2 SinglesBarry Haneberg vs Jake Bloom6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 SinglesDavid Carpenter vs Connor Rust1-6, 1-6
2025-10-06vs 4 Chestnut Oaks Mercurio 2.5Won 30
W#1 SinglesJonathan Kaufmann vs Antonio Jones-Stamm6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesCasey Whittaker vs Mark Cullip6-0, 6-0
W#3 SinglesTravers Edwards vs Andy Campbell6-0, 6-1
2025-10-01vs 2 SCC Tri Lambs - PercyWon 21
W#1 SinglesPatrick Harding vs David Percy6-0, 6-0
L#2 SinglesTravers Edwards vs John Troy Owens1-6, 3-6
W#3 SinglesBarry Haneberg vs Barry Exley6-4, 6-3
2025-09-22vs 7 ACAC - RhodesLost 12
L#1 SinglesJared Dunn vs Jarrett Sweeney1-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesJonathan Kaufmann vs James Searles6-2, 6-2
L#3 SinglesBrennan Quinby vs Chad Morris4-6, 3-6
2025-09-15vs 5 Westwood Wiz - WisotzkiWon 30
W#1 SinglesPatrick Harding vs Ezra Harmon6-0, 6-1
W#2 SinglesCasey Whittaker vs Joshua Alloway6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesBarry Haneberg vs Ricky Wong6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Singles 2.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.63 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.94
Jonathan Kaufmann
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Barry Haneberg
usually #3 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3
Casey Whittaker
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3
2.73
Travers Edwards
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
2.64
Patrick Harding
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
David Carpenter
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 2.5
2.19
Brennan Quinby
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 2.5
Jared Dunn
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jonathan Kaufmann
16W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
2.94
3
Barry Haneberg
5W–1L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Casey Whittaker
6W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Travers Edwards
8W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
Patrick Harding
15W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
15%84%1%
2.64
2.5
David Carpenter
4W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Brennan Quinby
5W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.19
Jared Dunn
6W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.