Teams

OVP/Crowe/5.5 Combo

2026 COTA USTA Southern Combo 18 & Over - Summer · Women's Day 5.5

17 players · average NTRP 2.75 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-08-12vs MCTC/HollisWon 21
L#1 DoublesKristi Rivas / Lindy Davis vs Jeanne Martin / Jessica Lamb3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesAmy Norris / Heather Tabor vs Jaimie Hollis / Abby Smoak6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAshleigh Griffith / Joanne Steele vs Brighton Patrick / Victoria Long6-4, 6-4
2026-08-05vs MCTC/HollisWon 20
W#1 DoublesMonica Skrzypinski / Ashley Smith vs Jeanne Martin / Cecily Pennington6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesChristian Williams / Heather Tabor vs Victoria Long / Rebekah Paschal6-0, 6-4
2026-07-22vs MCTC/HollisWon 21
W#1 DoublesThayer Tucker / Carrie Gray vs Jeanne Martin / Jessica Lamb6-3, 5-7
L#2 DoublesAmy Norris / Joanne Steele vs Angela Dean / Jaimie Hollis6-1, 0-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesHeather Watson / Valerie Robinson vs Patty Crumbley / Abby Smoak6-0, 6-2
2026-07-15vs MCTC/HollisWon 21
W#1 DoublesMonica Skrzypinski / Carrie Gray vs Patty Crumbley / Kenzie Abbott6-0, 3-6, 6-4
L#2 DoublesAshley Hawk / Joanne Steele vs Jeanne Martin / Jessica Lamb2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesAmy Norris / Jessica Crocker vs Traci Johns / Abby Smoak6-1, 6-0
2026-07-08vs MCTC/HollisWon 20
W#2 DoublesAshley Hawk / Brittany Schmitt vs Katie Werkin / Cecily Pennington6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKatie Duvall / Ashleigh Griffith vs Rebekah Paschal / Jessica Lamb0-6, 6-1, 1-3
2026-06-24vs MCTC/HollisWon 21
W#1 DoublesMonica Skrzypinski / Angie Garcia vs Angela Dean / Brighton Patrick3-6, 6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKristi Rivas / Heather Tabor vs Rebekah Paschal / Kenzie Abbott5-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesHeather Watson / Lindy Davis vs Traci Johns / Abby Smoak6-1, 6-4
2026-06-17vs MCTC/HollisWon 21
W#1 DoublesKasey Dillard / Ashley Smith vs Angela Dean / Jaimie Hollis6-2, 6-7, 6-0
L#2 DoublesThayer Tucker / Valerie Robinson vs Kenzie Abbott / Rebekah Paschal4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesAngela Crowe / Ashleigh Griffith vs Patty Crumbley / Cecily Pennington6-4, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Women's Day 5.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1OVP/Crowe/5.5 Combo7016515153
2MCTC/Hollis0751633241

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.61 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.99
Angela Crowe
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.97
Amy Norris
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.87
Thayer Tucker
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.84
Monica Skrzypinski
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published
2.79
Ashley Hawk
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.73
Kristi Rivas
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.68
Kasey Dillard
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.67
Katie Duvall
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.61
Lindy Davis
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.58
Heather Tabor
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.56
Brandy Chandler
published 2.5
2.48
Ashleigh Griffith
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.36
Joanne Steele
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.36
Valerie Robinson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.22
Brittany Schmitt
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.13
Jessica Crocker
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Missy Tucker
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ashley Hawk + Katie Duvall4648% games−2.2% vs expected
Kasey Dillard + Brandy Chandler213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Angela Crowe
8W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%52%48%
2.99
3
Amy Norris
16W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%59%41%
2.97
Thayer Tucker
24W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%82%17%
2.87
Monica Skrzypinski
54W–26L career · 8 lines in 2026
1%87%13%
2.84
3
Ashley Hawk
16W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
2.79
Kristi Rivas
12W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73
Kasey Dillard
32W–25L career · 4 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
2.68
Katie Duvall
21W–23L career · 2 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
2.67
Lindy Davis
6W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
2.61
Heather Tabor
10W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%30%70%
2.58
2.5
Brandy Chandler
33W–18L career · no lines in 2026
0%33%67%
2.56
2.5
Ashleigh Griffith
15W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%56%44%
2.48
Joanne Steele
6W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%84%16%
2.36
Valerie Robinson
6W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%84%16%
2.36
2.5
Brittany Schmitt
8W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.22
Jessica Crocker
3W–27L career · 1 line in 2026
>99%<1%<1%
2.13
Missy Tucker
0W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.