Teams

Wagon Wheel/Davis W4.0S

2025 DALLAS TENNIS 40 & Over ADULT W Sunday · W4.0S

14 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-02-23vs Fretz/Hull W4.0SSplit 22
L#1 DoublesAngela Gallegos / Julie Smith vs Carrie Hoogendoorn / Molly Pruner5-7, 4-6
W#1 SinglesAmy Dungan vs Lisa Douglas6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJudy Barbo / Mimi Tran vs Jennifer Hull / Heather Steele Curtis1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Shaw / Suzanne Ortolano vs Sophie Nini / Priscila Vidal7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 DoublesShawn Ward / Shana Lazarine vs Blaine Eschenburg / Anne Givens7-6, 7-5
W#1 SinglesLynn Mangus vs Heather Perkins6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesHope Heldmar / Suzette Fenton vs Silvia Tapia / August Wood2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMartha Davis / Kelly Thornton vs Beckey Fuller / Rachel Stoll4-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for W4.0S have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.74 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.00
Shana Lazarine
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.84
Lynn Mangus
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.83
Amy Dungan
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.77
Angela Gallegos
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.75
Hope Heldmar
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.74
Taryn Ziehm
published
3.62
Judy Barbo
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.59
Suzanne Ortolano
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.49
Kelly Thornton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Holly Murphy
published
Linda Bowers
published
Renee Haygood
published
Shawn Ward
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Suzette Fenton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Shana Lazarine
16W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
51%49%<1%
4.00
Lynn Mangus
28W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
1%87%12%
3.84
4
Amy Dungan
13W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
1%88%12%
3.83
4
Angela Gallegos
11W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
Hope Heldmar
20W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%3%
3.75
Taryn Ziehm
8W–4L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.74
Judy Barbo
11W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
19%80%<1%
3.62
Suzanne Ortolano
9W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.59
Kelly Thornton
9W–23L career · 1 line in 2025
53%47%<1%
3.49
Holly Murphy
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Linda Bowers
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Renee Haygood
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Shawn Ward
4W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Suzette Fenton
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.