Teams

GEPTA-4.5-Adult/18+W(Sandoval)(EPTC#2)

SouthernNewMexico · 2025 USA FALL ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE

13 players · average NTRP 4.33 / GEPTA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 2025 USA FALL ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.98 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.17
Angela Herrera
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.00
Claudia Calderon
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published 4.5
3.76
Angela de la Torre
usually #1 Singles 37%, also #2 Singles 32% · published 4
Fabiola P Hinojos
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 17% · published
Grace Gomez
usually #2 Doubles 51%, also #3 Doubles 23% · published
Hannah Juarez
usually #3 Doubles 34%, also #2 Doubles 31% · published
Iliana Sandoval
usually #1 Doubles 69%, also #3 Doubles 19% · published
Leila Lobato
usually #1 Doubles 53%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Luz Barraza
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Marisa Porras
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
Martha Eugenia Gomez Baca
usually #3 Doubles 35%, also #2 Doubles 31% · published
Paula Prado
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 31% · published
Valerie Santos
usually #1 Doubles 35%, also #1 Singles 18% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marisa Porras + Claudia Calderon11355% games+13.7% vs expected
Marisa Porras + Angela Herrera13651% games+2.4% vs expected
Angela Herrera + Paula Prado7941% games+0.4% vs expected
Marisa Porras + Iliana Sandoval10659% games+0.1% vs expected
Leila Lobato + Iliana Sandoval8359% gamesnot enough data
Leila Lobato + Marisa Porras9160% gamesnot enough data
Leila Lobato + Claudia Calderon3548% gamesnot enough data
Angela Herrera + Iliana Sandoval3454% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Angela Herrera
60W–52L career · 20 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
4.17
4.5
Claudia Calderon
41W–57L career · 28 lines in 2025
51%49%<1%
4.00
4
Angela de la Torre
49W–33L career · 18 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.76
Fabiola P Hinojos
25W–9L career · 12 lines in 2025
not enough data
Grace Gomez
145W–85L career · 53 lines in 2025
not enough data
Hannah Juarez
79W–45L career · 35 lines in 2025
not enough data
Iliana Sandoval
58W–42L career · 16 lines in 2025
not enough data
Leila Lobato
65W–61L career · 30 lines in 2025
not enough data
Luz Barraza
7W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Marisa Porras
94W–54L career · 16 lines in 2025
not enough data
Martha Eugenia Gomez Baca
44W–34L career · 29 lines in 2025
not enough data
Paula Prado
42W–46L career · 16 lines in 2025
not enough data
Valerie Santos
128W–66L career · 35 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.