Teams

EEverett-HVCC

2026 Eno River Adult 40 & Over · 40 Over Adult 3.0 Women Day

9 players · average NTRP 2.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2026-05-05vs LWollman-CHCCSplit 22
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Everett / Stacey Smith vs Sara Morgan / Valerie Williams2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesJoanie Preyer vs Mignon Lunsford3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesLaurie Myer / Lauren Powell vs Jane Holroyd / Lee Wollman7-5, 6-0
W#3 DoublesEmily Huckabee / Ashley Perry vs Sarah Lamb / Julie Vozella4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-04-29vs KCabelka-HRLost 13
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Everett / Mary Grigg vs Karen Sonders / Barbie McGarrah0-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesJoanie Preyer vs Anna Wilson3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesStacey Smith / Lauren Powell vs Lissa Gotwals / Lisa Andrew3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAshley Perry / Susan Peak vs Rachel Mason / Doreen Sanfelici1-6, 1-6
2026-04-22vs AHeymann-UNCLost 04
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Everett / Mary Grigg vs Rebekah Farris / LAURIE KIEFFER7-5, 5-7, 0-1
L#1 SinglesJoanie Preyer vs Courtney Mills0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSusan Hayes / Lauren Powell vs Leslie Heymann / Barbara Correal2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesEmily Huckabee / Ashley Perry vs Anne Heymann / Lauren Zedek3-6, 2-6
2026-04-15vs LWollman-CHCCLost 12
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Everett / Mary Grigg vs Valerie Williams / Jane Holroyd0-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesJoanie Preyer vs Mignon Lunsford4-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesLaurie Myer / Ashley Perry vs Pippa Englert / Lee Wollman6-2, 6-3
2026-04-08vs JWeiser-HRWon 40
W#1 DoublesStacey Smith / Elizabeth Everett vs Jan ORegan / Nancy Rocamora6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJoanie Preyer vs Renu Mathias6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSusan Hayes / Lauren Powell vs Jaclyn Weiser / Susan Kim6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesLaurie Myer / Ashley Perry vs Kathleen Fitts / Amanda Klein6-4, 7-6
2026-03-31vs JMyers-CHCCWon 10
W#1 DoublesLaurie Myer / Mary Grigg vs Kimberly Jeffs / Julie Myers4-6, 6-0, 1-0
2026-03-26vs AHeymann-UNCLost 13
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Everett / Stacey Smith vs Leslie Heymann / Courtney Mills4-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesJoanie Preyer vs Ilana Osten6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesSusan Hayes / Emily Huckabee vs Anne Heymann / Lauren Zedek0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSusan Peak / Mary Grigg vs Lisa Saenz / Barbara Correal1-6, 4-6
2026-03-25vs KCabelka-HRSplit 22
L#1 DoublesSusan Hayes / Mary Grigg vs Karen Sonders / Lindsey McIver4-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesJoanie Preyer vs Lisa Andrew4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Everett / Stacey Smith vs Kim Cabelka / Helen Youngblood6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLauren Powell / Ashley Perry vs Amanda Alexander Klein / Barbie McGarrah7-5, 6-4
2026-03-04vs JWeiser-HRWon 21
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Everett / Mary Grigg vs Athena Samaras / Jaclyn Weiser6-1, 6-2
L#1 SinglesAshley Perry vs Jan ORegan3-6, 0-2
W#2 DoublesSusan Peak / Susan Hayes vs Susan Kim / Renu Mathias4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-02-25vs JMyers-CHCCLost 04
L#1 DoublesMary Grigg / Susan Hayes vs Erin Kent / Sara Moody2-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesElizabeth Everett vs Leslie Fernandez0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesStacey Smith / Susan Peak vs Kimberly Jeffs / Meghan Burns2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesAshley Perry / Emily Huckabee vs Karrie Tilley / Courtney Whilden2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 40 Over Adult 3.0 Women Day
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LWollman-CHCC64192146337
2EEverett-HVCC27132350365
3JWeiser-HR1933774443

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.70 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.97
Lauren Powell
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
2.96
Joanie Preyer
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.90
Laurie Myer
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.78
Mary Grigg
usually #1 Doubles 88%, also #3 Doubles 13% · published
Beth Sholtz
published 3
2.66
Elizabeth Everett
usually #1 Doubles 78%, also #2 Doubles 11% · published
2.48
Emily Huckabee
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.46
Susan Peak
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.41
Ashley Perry
usually #3 Doubles 88%, also #1 Singles 13% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Grigg + Elizabeth Everett134 matchesnot enough data
Emily Huckabee + Ashley Perry123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lauren Powell
7W–7L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%59%41%
2.97
Joanie Preyer
12W–12L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
2.96
Laurie Myer
9W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
2.90
Mary Grigg
4W–8L career · 8 lines in 2026
2%92%5%
2.78
3
Beth Sholtz
0W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Elizabeth Everett
8W–20L career · 9 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
2.66
Emily Huckabee
1W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
56%44%<1%
2.48
Susan Peak
2W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
60%40%<1%
2.46
2.5
Ashley Perry
9W–7L career · 8 lines in 2026
0%74%26%
2.41

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.