Teams

Olde Cypress - Navarro

2021 Collier Adult 40 & Over Winter · 4.0 Adult 40 & Over Women

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-03-09vs Pelican Bay Park - DelkSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKristen Catino / Shelley Boggess vs Catherine Rigamer / Kimberly Davey3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesHeather Christie / Candice Lopez vs Heather Larkin / Wendy Garber1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2021-02-23vs Pelican Marsh - BargerWon 21
L#1 DoublesMinde Shinnick / Lori Coates vs Sunny Barger / Brenda Rhoda6-7, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesHeather Christie / Candice Lopez vs Diana Pleeter / Teresa Madonia6-2, 7-6
W#3 DoublesLori Caple / Tracy Lockton vs Debra Bowenkamp / Christine Turk3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2021-02-16vs Quail West - A. PacanaLost 03
L#1 DoublesKristen Catino / Shelley Boggess vs Vesna Petrovic / Lisa Kresse6-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKarey Hogan / Jo Anna Cline vs Tasha Christiansen / Amista Morgan3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesCheryl Toth / Kathleen Farmer vs Nediljka Graf / Sandra Steller2-6, 3-6
L#1 DoublesKathleen Farmer / Tracy Lockton vs Mary Miranda-Del Rossi / Michele Nelson-Baker3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesLori Coates / Minde Shinnick vs Robin Jelinek / Maureen Wells0-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesShelley Boggess / Kristen Catino vs Terry Dirr / Lisa Ruffolo5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2021-02-02vs Pelican Bay Park - DelkLost 12
L#1 DoublesJo Anna Cline / Karey Hogan vs Dayna Webre / Susan Burgess2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesLori Caple / Cheryl Toth vs Kimberly Davey / Lisa Gosney5-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesHeather Christie / Candice Lopez vs Heather Larkin / Catherine Rigamer6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2021-01-26vs Naples Grande - L. LaveryLost 13
W#1 DoublesLori Coates / Minde Shinnick vs Anne Marie Russell / Peggy Hogan6-1, 6-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesKathleen Farmer vs Carol Polipnick2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesShelley Boggess / Kristen Catino vs Barbara Dovin / Shannon Carroll3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesKarey Hogan / Lori Caple vs Kathy Healy / Lorrie Lavery6-7, 4-6
2021-01-19vs Marco YMCA - J. HeiseLost 03
L#1 DoublesKarey Hogan / Minde Shinnick vs Stephanie Opel / Marzenna Nowak3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesKathleen Farmer vs Tricia McBride4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesHeather Christie / Candice Lopez vs Mary Milchanowski / Sharon Balsamo5-7, 2-6
2021-01-12vs Pelican Marsh - BargerLost 12
L#1 DoublesShelley Boggess / Kristen Catino vs Lauren Keillor / Julie Mans2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLori Coates / Kathleen Farmer vs Carla Klumpp / Kristine Laterra6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJo Anna Cline / Lori Caple vs Marie Shoaf / Christine Turk5-7, 6-1, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Adult 40 & Over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.64 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Heather Christie
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.77
Minde Shinnick
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.73
Kristen Catino
published
3.73
Karey Hogan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.69
Tracy Lockton
published
3.65
Lori Caple
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.60
Shelley Boggess
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.48
Melody Miller
published
3.36
Susanne Navarro
published
Jo Anna Cline
published
Kathleen Farmer
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Lori Coates
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Minde Shinnick + Lori Coates312552% games+0.2% vs expected
Kathleen Farmer + Susanne Navarro4841% games−5.6% vs expected
Lori Coates + Susanne Navarro13851% gamesnot enough data
Karey Hogan + Susanne Navarro8946% gamesnot enough data
Minde Shinnick + Karey Hogan4943% gamesnot enough data
Shelley Boggess + Susanne Navarro7548% gamesnot enough data
Karey Hogan + Lori Caple6452% gamesnot enough data
Susanne Navarro + Lori Caple5350% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Heather Christie
67W–72L career · 4 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.77
Minde Shinnick
119W–115L career · 4 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.77
Kristen Catino
23W–21L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.73
Karey Hogan
91W–110L career · 4 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.73
Tracy Lockton
99W–49L career · no lines in 2021
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Lori Caple
130W–93L career · 4 lines in 2021
12%87%<1%
3.65
Shelley Boggess
191W–176L career · 5 lines in 2021
23%77%<1%
3.60
Melody Miller
31W–11L career · no lines in 2021
<1%55%45%
3.48
Susanne Navarro
229W–208L career · no lines in 2021
<1%86%14%
3.36
Jo Anna Cline
25W–15L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Kathleen Farmer
75W–85L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Lori Coates
202W–160L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.