← Teams

MAC-Lovett/Go

2024 Adult 55 & Over · 8.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.88 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.46 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

—
Kim Stevens
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
—
Susie Jansky
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.67
Linda Lovett
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published 4
3.62
Laura Luthi
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.58
Catherine Go
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.43
Terri Pickard
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.24
Dana McKillop
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.22
Michele Desmarais
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
Results10 ties
2023-12-02Split 1–1
W#1 DoublesLaura Luthi / Linda Lovett vs Penny Birkhofer / Michele Snyder5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKim Stevens / Pam Saftler vs Cathryn Hansen / Donna Roisom6-3, 6-3
2023-11-19Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesLaura Luthi / Terri Pickard vs Sandi Bittler / Irena Ilcheva7-6, 6-2
W#2 DoublesCatherine Go / Sally Lovett vs Elizabeth Domagalski / Kathleen Budnick6-3, 7-6
L#3 DoublesKim Stevens / Susie Jansky vs Sherri Sacconaghi / Susan Suttich6-3, 6-1
2023-11-12Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesLinda Lovett / Laura Luthi vs Ellen Bowman / Margaret Sivertsen6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSally Lovett / Catherine Go vs Cheryl Roloff / Suzanne Boss6-2, 6-2
2023-11-11Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesTerri Gotcher / Susie Jansky vs Claire Thayer / Carol Briggs6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSally Lovett / Terri Pickard vs Cindy Speck / Naomi Steinberg6-1, 0-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLaura Luthi / Linda Lovett vs Kate Leatherbarrow / Robby Lafleur6-4, 6-0
2023-10-28Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesLinda Lovett / Kim Stevens vs Tami Oglesby / Karen Pickering6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDana McKillop / Jean Herbst vs Pamela Buckley / Lori D'Antonio6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesPam Saftler / Susie Jansky vs Cindy Rushall / Carol Chiu7-5, 6-2
2023-10-22Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesDana McKillop / Pam Saftler vs Angie Lee / Bo Yu6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesTerri Pickard / Kim Stevens vs Donna Kennish / Rie Sasakawa6-4, 6-4
2023-10-15Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesCatherine Go / Laura Luthi vs Lisa Lyon / Jan Rothert6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesSusie Jansky / Pam Saftler vs Cathy Porter / Jana Corder6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2023-10-07Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesCatherine Go / Terri Pickard vs Marie Picard / Cathy Valentine4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLinda Lovett / Pamela Hummelt vs Erica Tsuruta / Kay Dobashi6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJean Herbst / Kim Stevens vs Carrie Fisher / Judi Babcock6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2023-10-05Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesTerri Pickard / Catherine Go vs Nancy Korenek-Leveque / Paula Watt6-3, 6-0
L#2 DoublesSara Salvi / Susie Jansky vs Babette Zielinski / Kris Kelly-Koster6-0, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLinda Lovett / Pamela Hummelt vs Anita Havemann / Susan Branam7-6, 2-6, 1-0
2023-09-16Won 1–0
W#3 DoublesLinda Lovett / Michele Desmarais vs Annie Sumpter / Nenette Olson3-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Kim Stevens
56W–44L career
not enough data
—
4
Susie Jansky
53W–45L career
not enough data
—
4
Linda Lovett
93W–105L career
4%96%0%
3.67
4
Laura Luthi
30W–28L career
10%90%0%
3.62
4
Catherine Go
87W–77L career
18%82%0%
3.58
4
Terri Pickard
44W–44L career
52%48%0%
3.43
3.5
Dana McKillop
23W–65L career
1%98%0%
3.24
3.5
Michele Desmarais
56W–45L career
7%92%2%
3.22

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.