Teams

WI Adult 18&O 3.0W MALT Kobelski

2026 WI Adult 18 & Over · WI Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Women

6 players · average NTRP / WISCONSIN

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-06-18vs WI Adult 18&O 3.0W MALT PalreddyWon 21
W#2 DoublesAlyssa Resop / Karen Kobelski vs Claire Schaefer / Katrina Kelly6-3, 6-3
L#2 SinglesEmily Stephenson vs SOUMYA PALREDDY1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesLaura Parker / Melissa Siewert vs Kristy Kelly / Claire Hotz6-2, 6-1
2026-06-11vs WI Adult 18&O 3.0W MALT AndersonLost 02
L#2 DoublesKaren Kobelski / Melissa Siewert vs Amy Fields / Ling Wu2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesMolly Dewey / Katelyn Klein vs Mei Hu / Jung Sung Park2-6, 3-6
2026-05-21vs WI Adult 18&O 3.0W MALT MatsonLost 13
L#1 DoublesHaley Smith / Emily Stephenson vs Laura Matson / Rachel Yeck1-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesKristen Marten vs Elise Nelson6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesKaren Kobelski / Laura Parker vs Katherine Roth / Lisa Kvernen1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKatelyn Klein / Emily Ratsavong vs Ella Tomko / Paula Bezark-larue0-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WI Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.32 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.33
Karen Kobelski
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.30
Melissa Siewert
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Emily Stephenson
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Katelyn Klein
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kristen Marten
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Molly Dewey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen Kobelski + Molly Dewey123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Karen Kobelski
24W–25L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%89%11%
2.33
Melissa Siewert
6W–9L career · 8 lines in 2026
0%92%8%
2.30
Emily Stephenson
0W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Katelyn Klein
2W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kristen Marten
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Molly Dewey
5W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.