Teams

1 James River Morgan's Surge

2021 Richmond Adult 40 & Over Weekend · Richmond Adult 40 & Over Men 4.5

9 players · average NTRP 4.43 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-08-16Won 10
W#3 DoublesGlenn Dubiel / Yong Ko vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-08-08Won 10
W#3 DoublesGlenn Dubiel / Warren Smigo vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-07-24vs 3 Westwood StaffordLost 01
L#2 DoublesAdam Plotkin / Yong Ko vs Mark Duncan / Charles Stafford7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2021-07-23vs 4 MAC JohnstonWon 10
W#2 DoublesSung Kang / Gordon Macgill vs Chuck Snow / Wayne Motley5-7, 6-1, 1-0
2021-07-18vs 4 MAC JohnstonSplit 11
W#2 DoublesSung Kang / Gordon Macgill vs James Cooke / Mike Jackson6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesYong Ko / Warren Smigo vs Chuck Snow / Michael Piland2-6, 5-7
2021-07-11Won 10
W#3 DoublesSung Kang / Dale Nowery vs James Lawrence / Albert Thomas7-5, 7-5
2021-07-06Lost 01
L#3 DoublesJeff Richman / Warren Smigo vs Luis Rodriguez-Miranda / Eric Cofer2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2021-06-28vs 3 Westwood StaffordWon 10
W#1 DoublesYong Ko / Sung Kang vs William Pilc / Charles Wayland6-4, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 40 & Over Men 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.97 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.46
Brian Rowe
published 4.5
Craig Morgan
published 4.5
4.19
Sung Kang
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.17
Dale Nowery
published 4.5
4.04
Yong Ko
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.97
Grant Slegowski
published 4.5
3.92
Jay Nelson
published
3.67
Warren Smigo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.33
Jeff Richman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Warren Smigo + Sung Kang033 matchesnot enough data
Warren Smigo + Yong Ko213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Brian Rowe
13W–8L career · no lines in 2021
<1%63%37%
4.46
4.5
Craig Morgan
1W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
4.5
Sung Kang
202W–85L career · 4 lines in 2021
7%92%1%
4.19
4.5
Dale Nowery
12W–6L career · no lines in 2021
9%90%1%
4.17
4.5
Yong Ko
99W–80L career · 4 lines in 2021
38%62%<1%
4.04
4.5
Grant Slegowski
153W–43L career · no lines in 2021
58%42%<1%
3.97
Jay Nelson
14W–18L career · no lines in 2021
73%27%<1%
3.92
4
Warren Smigo
72W–159L career · 3 lines in 2021
9%90%1%
3.67
Jeff Richman
5W–11L career · no lines in 2021
90%10%<1%
3.33

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.