Teams

CHARB-Groenweghe/Willenborg

2025 Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.39 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.31
Lisa Wisthoff
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.31
Karen Groenweghe
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.26
Christine Wall
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
Kathi Gray
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.24
Carole Bell
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.04
Christine Taylor
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.03
Marlene Enos
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.96
Pauline Reilly
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.56
Karla Hendrickson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
Results8 ties
2024-11-09Won 21
W#1 DoublesSammie Sue Willenborg / Lisa Wisthoff vs Toni Kidd / Lucila Griesser6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKaren Groenweghe / Christine Taylor vs Linda Graham / Jennifer Trank6-3, 7-5
L#3 DoublesErin Thole / Pauline Reilly vs Susan Branam / Cricket Forsey6-2, 6-4
2024-11-02Won 21
L#1 DoublesPauline Reilly / Lisa Wisthoff vs Della Shanley / Caroline Hall7-5, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKathi Gray / Christine Taylor vs Nicolle Lochner / Kristin Campbell2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMarlene Enos / Sammie Sue Willenborg vs Wendy Hill / Janet Dowty6-1, 6-0
2024-10-27Lost 03
L#1 DoublesKaren Groenweghe / Kathi Gray vs Caroline Hall / Della Shanley3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPauline Reilly / Sandy Rousseau vs Kristin Campbell / Nicolle Lochner6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTara Guimont / Karla Hendrickson vs Cathy Koerner / Kathleen Cooney3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-10-19Won 20
W#1 DoublesKaren Groenweghe / Denise Angel vs May Graham / Kimbra Kasch6-0, 6-4
W#3 DoublesCarole Bell / Christine Wall vs Jennifer Pultz / Dianna Kaady3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-10-12Lost 12
L#1 DoublesChristine Taylor / Karen Groenweghe vs Miriam Habafy / Michelle Johnson6-2, 7-6
W#2 DoublesTara Guimont / Carole Bell vs Allison Crisp / Teufelin Traylen6-3, 7-5
L#3 DoublesSandy Rousseau / Marlene Enos vs Kaie Wellman / Ann Arp7-5, 6-0
2024-10-04Won 21
W#1 DoublesKaren Groenweghe / Denise Angel vs Kristi Tompkins / Debra Hall6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesChristine Wall / Jennifer Wiencek vs Amy Patton / Dipali Dixit1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMarlene Enos / Pauline Reilly vs Ann Davidson / Susan Bradley6-2, 6-3
2024-09-28Won 20
W#1 DoublesKaren Groenweghe / Sammie Sue Willenborg vs Sandy Swift / Bernadette Lisac6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesChristine Wall / Carole Bell vs Sandra Ellis / Jeny Joseph6-3, 7-5
2024-09-07Lost 12
W#1 DoublesChristine Taylor / Sammie Sue Willenborg vs Sarah Mutal / May Graham0-6
L#2 DoublesMarlene Enos / Kathi Gray vs Mary Priester / Colleen Kellogg6-3, 7-6
L#3 DoublesKarla Hendrickson / Christine Wall vs Sheryl Riley / Dar Dragoon4-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Lisa Wisthoff
34W–29L career
3%90%7%
3.31
3.5
Karen Groenweghe
82W–81L career
0%98%1%
3.31
4
Christine Wall
81W–93L career
94%6%0%
3.26
3.5
Kathi Gray
28W–50L career
not enough data
3
Carole Bell
23W–23L career
0%15%85%
3.24
3.5
Christine Taylor
47W–49L career · type A
24%76%0%
3.04
3.5
Marlene Enos
42W–75L career · type A
24%76%0%
3.03
3
Pauline Reilly
22W–31L career
0%81%19%
2.96
3
Karla Hendrickson
41W–109L career
18%82%0%
2.56

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.