Teams

UPTA40T/Cooper/HWY14

2024 UPTA Tri-Level 40 & Over - USTA · 40+ TL Women - 3.0, 3.5, 4.0

21 players · average NTRP 3.75 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 40+ TL Women - 3.0, 3.5, 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Jackie Cooper
published
3.60
3.59
Janet Matricciani
published
3.52
Kristy Tarallo
published
3.52
Celeste Blinston
published 4
3.46
Tressa Jordan
published
3.41
Rebecca Maddox
published
3.41
Maria Gulli
published
3.32
Jennifer Tuttle
published
3.31
Amanda Powell
published 3.5
3.28
Rebecca Haas
published
3.26
Gera Mort
published
3.18
Jill Baker
published
3.17
Monika Franz
published
3.16
Danielle Henderson
published 3.5
3.09
Kristin Bissinger
published
3.03
Mona Cooper
published
3.00
Tracie Segura
published
2.42
Elizabeth Faulkner
published
Katie Burns
published
Lisette Missler
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tressa Jordan + Kristin Bissinger3352% games+1.8% vs expected
Mona Cooper + Danielle Henderson3742% games−4.5% vs expected
Maria Gulli + Kristy Tarallo5064% gamesnot enough data
Kristin Bissinger + Celeste Blinston3251% gamesnot enough data
Mona Cooper + Amanda Powell044 matchesnot enough data
Janet Matricciani + Christina Burnette134 matchesnot enough data
Danielle Henderson + Amanda Powell224 matchesnot enough data
Danielle Henderson + Monika Franz224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jackie Cooper
28W–14L career · no lines in 2024
<1%76%23%
3.90
4
Christina Burnette
38W–20L career · no lines in 2024
23%77%<1%
3.60
Janet Matricciani
27W–33L career · no lines in 2024
25%74%<1%
3.59
Kristy Tarallo
47W–21L career · no lines in 2024
<1%<1%>99%
3.52
4
Celeste Blinston
38W–25L career · no lines in 2024
46%54%<1%
3.52
Tressa Jordan
23W–19L career · no lines in 2024
62%38%<1%
3.46
Rebecca Maddox
31W–33L career · no lines in 2024
<1%<1%>99%
3.41
Maria Gulli
65W–27L career · no lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
3.41
Jennifer Tuttle
32W–21L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Amanda Powell
22W–31L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.31
Rebecca Haas
41W–69L career · no lines in 2024
<1%2%98%
3.28
Gera Mort
18W–27L career · no lines in 2024
3%93%4%
3.26
Jill Baker
4W–2L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.18
Monika Franz
33W–21L career · no lines in 2024
<1%12%88%
3.17
3.5
Danielle Henderson
31W–29L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.16
Kristin Bissinger
14W–13L career · no lines in 2024
<1%27%73%
3.09
Mona Cooper
34W–45L career · no lines in 2024
<1%42%58%
3.03
Tracie Segura
33W–36L career · no lines in 2024
<1%51%49%
3.00
Elizabeth Faulkner
15W–29L career · no lines in 2024
0%72%28%
2.42
Katie Burns
8W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Lisette Missler
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.