Teams

Spirit Park - McKean/Harrell

2025 Adult 18 & Over Women Fall Night - Mobile · 3.0 Women Night 18+

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.0 Women Night 18+ have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.99 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Alecia Harrell
published 4
3.46
Aimee Crowley
published 3.5
3.40
3.29
Laura Brand
published
3.15
Ashley Howard
published 3.5
3.03
Kelsi Maulding
published
3.03
Dana McKean
published 3.5
2.77
Kimberly Long
published
2.72
Brooke Rudisill
published 3
2.60
Whitney Bain
published
2.56
Hannah Broich
published
2.35
Yolanda Stokley
published
Michelle Teeters
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Blair Carmichael-Lober + Ashley Howard14162% games+10.7% vs expected
Dana McKean + Kelsi Maulding3253% games+9.1% vs expected
Blair Carmichael-Lober + Alecia Harrell4162% games+6.0% vs expected
Alecia Harrell + Kelsi Maulding314 matchesnot enough data
Yolanda Stokley + Brooke Rudisill303 matchesnot enough data
Blair Carmichael-Lober + Dana McKean213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Alecia Harrell
62W–61L career · no lines in 2025
49%51%<1%
3.50
3.5
Aimee Crowley
46W–25L career · no lines in 2025
<1%62%38%
3.46
3.5
Blair Carmichael-Lober
40W–14L career · no lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.40
Laura Brand
12W–11L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.29
3.5
Ashley Howard
27W–13L career · no lines in 2025
15%85%1%
3.15
Kelsi Maulding
26W–17L career · no lines in 2025
<1%41%59%
3.03
3.5
Dana McKean
36W–26L career · no lines in 2025
43%57%<1%
3.03
Kimberly Long
24W–33L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Brooke Rudisill
11W–24L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
Whitney Bain
8W–13L career · no lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
2.60
Hannah Broich
27W–20L career · no lines in 2025
0%32%68%
2.56
Yolanda Stokley
3W–7L career · no lines in 2025
85%15%<1%
2.35
Michelle Teeters
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.