← Teams

SHC-Trank/Heck

2023 Mixed 40 & Over · 7.0 Mixed

10 players · average NTRP 3.45 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Patrick Trank
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.68
Matthew Trank
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.46
Bill Rhoades
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.42
Daniel Heck
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
—
Dan Bingham
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.13
Jeff Welter
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.93
Autumn Bunch
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.90
Jennifer Trank
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
—
Linnette Donohue
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.73
Nancy Heck
published 3
Results8 ties
2023-03-12Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesMatthew Trank / Kerri Patrick vs Jason Fitzgerald / Colleen Nolan6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesAutumn Bunch / Andy Bunch vs John Boelling / Debbie Frankel5-7, 7-5, 1-0
2023-02-19Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesBill Rhoades / Autumn Bunch vs Mary Logsdon / Steve Harris3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMichael Mayer / Linnette Donohue vs Nina Sanna / Jacob Johnson6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJeff Welter / Nancy Heck vs Renee Schwartz / Jeff Streich6-4, 7-6
2023-02-18Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesPatrick Trank / Jennifer Trank vs Jim Fisher / Paula Conway6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesBill Rhoades / Nancy Heck vs Anthony Guzzi / Kathy Ramsey6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesMark Stephenson / Linnette Donohue vs Kevin Grainger / Joy Kolesnikoff6-3, 6-2
2023-02-11Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesSusan Judge / Dan Bingham vs Tony Mattos / Suki Birge6-0, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJennifer Trank / Patrick Trank vs Dean Waters / Susan Rolfe6-2, 6-0
L#3 DoublesNancy Heck / Daniel Heck vs Charles Stewart / Catherine Greenblatt1-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-01-29Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesLinnette Donohue / Mark Stephenson vs Gregg Palmer / Lisa Hockman6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesBill Rhoades / Kerri Patrick vs Barbara Dusicka / David Pham6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesAutumn Bunch / Andy Bunch vs Laurie Horenstein / Vincent Lee6-0, 6-1
2023-01-22Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesMatthew Trank / Kerri Patrick vs Paul Harwood / Theresa Berry6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesPatrick Trank / Jennifer Trank vs William Pinelli / Shari Levelle6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAndy Bunch / Autumn Bunch vs Colin Looi / Kim Tellin6-2, 6-1
2023-01-13Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesKerri Patrick / Bill Rhoades vs Mihee Park / Chinwoo Kim6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesNancy Heck / Daniel Heck vs Yookyung Noh / Jungyoon Kim6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRobin Welter / Jeff Welter vs Woohyung Kim / Jihoon Bang7-6, 7-5
2023-01-08Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesBill Rhoades / Kerri Patrick vs Daniel Gorecki / Julie Gorecki6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesDaniel Heck / Jennifer Trank vs Kelley Gaylor / Dean Gaylor6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDan Bingham / Susan Judge vs Trylla Lembke / Alan Jones4-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Patrick Trank
87W–59L career
1%98%1%
3.79
4
Matthew Trank
78W–63L career
3%97%0%
3.68
4
Bill Rhoades
79W–87L career
43%57%0%
3.46
3.5
Daniel Heck
12W–33L career
0%87%13%
3.42
3.5
Dan Bingham
46W–43L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Jeff Welter
77W–46L career
11%89%0%
3.13
3
Autumn Bunch
68W–71L career
0%92%8%
2.93
3
Jennifer Trank
93W–104L career
0%96%4%
2.90
3
Linnette Donohue
20W–28L career
not enough data
—
3
Nancy Heck
17W–17L career
6%92%2%
2.73

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.