Teams

FK - Kiefer

2024 Marion Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Adult Men 55 & Over

10 players · average NTRP 3.67 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-03-24vs The Villages - JamesLost 01
L#2 DoublesJoe Marino / Robert Stevenson vs William Traylor / Robert Anglace6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2024-03-17vs Marion/McMahon/55&Over7.0MWon 20
W#1 DoublesPeter Grosshans / Stephen Bernard vs Michael Tringali / Matthew Pirtle6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesGrady Grimes / Glen Gandiongco vs Monty Shelton / Dennis Malone7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2024-03-09vs The Villages - JamesWon 10
W#2 DoublesPeter Grosshans / Danny York vs Jerry Johnson / William Traylor4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-02-19vs Marion/McMahon/55&Over7.0MLost 02
L#2 DoublesPaul Franck / Ralf Barckhausen vs Sunil Gandhi / Michael Tringali3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJoe Marino / Robert Stevenson vs Rob Fye / Dennis Malone4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2024-01-21vs The Villages - JamesWon 21
L#1 DoublesStephen Bernard / Joe Marino vs Robert Anglace / William Traylor2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesPeter Grosshans / Danny York vs Terry Womack / Blake Gall6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesGlen Gandiongco / Christopher Clements vs Robert Mazzeo / Michael James6-1, 6-3
2024-01-14vs Marion/McMahon/55&Over7.0MSplit 11
L#2 DoublesPaul Franck / Stephen Bernard vs Matthew Pirtle / Christopher Seekamp4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesGlen Gandiongco / Luis Carrascosa vs Dennis Malone / Rob Fye7-5, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Adult Men 55 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.66
Peter Grosshans
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.50
3.30
Paul Franck
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.19
Glen Gandiongco
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
3.13
Joe Marino
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.07
Danny York
published 3.5
Grady Grimes
published
Jack Matlock
published
John Pritchard
published
Scott Kiefer
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Glen Gandiongco + Peter Grosshans123 matchesnot enough data
Danny York + Christopher Clements213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Peter Grosshans
148W–114L career · 3 lines in 2024
13%87%1%
3.66
3.5
Christopher Clements
21W–15L career · no lines in 2024
<1%51%49%
3.50
Paul Franck
59W–85L career · 5 lines in 2024
2%91%8%
3.30
Glen Gandiongco
123W–124L career · 6 lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.19
Joe Marino
64W–73L career · 3 lines in 2024
17%83%<1%
3.13
3.5
Danny York
6W–7L career · no lines in 2024
32%68%<1%
3.07
Grady Grimes
3W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jack Matlock
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
John Pritchard
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Scott Kiefer
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.