Teams

A18 4.5M AS Slomski

2023 NEOTA Adult 18 & Over · NEOTA A18&O 4.5 Men

16 players · average NTRP 4.17 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-07-18vs A18 4.5M LT2 SniderWon 32
W#1 DoublesJustin Csepe / David Dilyard vs David Disabato / Toshiharu Yoda6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesAdam Slomski vs Akisa Kayashima6-0, 6-4
W#2 DoublesRyan Mecurio / Thomas Secrist vs Christopher Bolinger / Frank Griffiths6-2, 6-4
L#2 SinglesJustin Crooks vs Taras Balyuk7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesChristopher Tunnell / Jason Self vs John Lesher / Ward Crane3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-07-11vs A18 4.5M PM Hodgkiss-LillyLost 14
W#1 DoublesJustin Csepe / David Dilyard vs Jason Trapp / Ryan Trapp7-5, 6-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAdam Slomski vs Aaron Yeh4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLouis Thomas / Bobby Thomas vs Jason Christman / Thomas Hodgkiss-Lilly4-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesJustin Crooks vs Robert Cross7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesRyan Mecurio / Thomas Secrist vs Thomas Michalski / Jacob Liebler2-6, 2-6
2023-06-13vs A18 4.5M CRC FocklerLost 23
L#1 DoublesLouis Thomas / Arthur Prodafikas vs Nicholas Fockler / Rob Demarco3-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesAdam Slomski vs Dylan Schrode6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesDavid Dilyard / Ryan Mecurio vs KYLE SHRAIBERG / Adam Pagon6-1, 6-3
L#2 SinglesMichael Cremer vs Nate Fockler0-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesMichael Jackson / Jason Self vs Austin Smedira / Nick Smedira3-6, 1-6
2023-06-06vs A18 4.5M GMS GriffithsWon 40
W#1 DoublesAdam Slomski / Justin Csepe vs Ryan McClure / Spencer Selman6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesJustin Crooks vs Louis Murphy6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesThomas Secrist / Ryan Mecurio vs Philip Dubsky / Michael Rose7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJason Self / Michael Jackson vs Kevin Lillie / Jeffrey Griffiths6-4, 6-2
2023-05-23vs A18 4.5M MV AtwellWon 32
W#1 DoublesJustin Csepe / Daniel Thomas vs Andrew Siciliano / Andrew Triner6-3, 7-5
W#1 SinglesAdam Slomski vs Mark Beebe4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesArthur Prodafikas / Bobby Thomas vs Jason Putman / Armen Panosyan2-6, 6-7
L#2 SinglesMichael Cremer vs Tyler Cole1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesDavid Dilyard / Jason Self vs Phong Nguyen / Adam Atwell7-5, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NEOTA A18&O 4.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.17 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.53
David Dilyard
usually #1 Singles 62%, also #1 Doubles 23% · published 4.5
4.47
Adam Slomski
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.29
Ryan Mecurio
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
4.28
Justin Csepe
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.07
Christopher Tunnell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.97
Justin Crooks
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.91
Jason Self
usually #1 Singles 42%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.84
Dan Paulus
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 4
Arthur Prodafikas
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
Cordell Smith
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Barton Schenck
published
Bobby Thomas
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Joseph Donnelly
usually #2 Singles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
Louis Thomas
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Michael Cremer
usually #2 Singles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
Thomas Secrist
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Justin Csepe + Adam Slomski7164% games+8.1% vs expected
David Dilyard + Jason Self6355% games+3.1% vs expected
Christopher Tunnell + Jason Self1842% games−9.8% vs expected
Justin Csepe + Jason Self6070% gamesnot enough data
Michael Cremer + Justin Crooks2443% gamesnot enough data
Jason Self + Justin Crooks2346% gamesnot enough data
Dan Paulus + Jason Self224 matchesnot enough data
Cordell Smith + Jason Self134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
David Dilyard
99W–79L career · 13 lines in 2023
<1%41%59%
4.53
4.5
Adam Slomski
80W–38L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%60%40%
4.47
Ryan Mecurio
10W–9L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%93%6%
4.29
Justin Csepe
40W–11L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%94%5%
4.28
4
Christopher Tunnell
34W–34L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%30%70%
4.07
Justin Crooks
15W–26L career · 3 lines in 2023
58%42%<1%
3.97
Jason Self
83W–86L career · 12 lines in 2023
<1%75%25%
3.91
4
Dan Paulus
44W–39L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%88%11%
3.84
4
Arthur Prodafikas
9W–8L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Cordell Smith
4W–9L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Barton Schenck
8W–9L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Bobby Thomas
9W–7L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Joseph Donnelly
7W–8L career · 7 lines in 2023
not enough data
Louis Thomas
7W–9L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Michael Cremer
61W–34L career · 10 lines in 2023
not enough data
Thomas Secrist
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.